Chasing Aphrodite:
The Hunt for Looted Antiquities
at the World's Richest Museum
Chasing
Aphrodite is a book about the J. Paul Getty Museum in Los Angeles . The title refers to a statue of
the Greek goddess, which the museum bought in 1988, despite obvious signs that
it had been looted from an ancient Greek site on the Italian island of Sicily . The subtitle explains the scope: The Hunt for Looted Antiquities at the World's Richest Museum.
The book is
written by Jason Felch, an investigative reporter with the Los Angeles Times,
and Ralph Frammolino, who was an investigative reporter with the Los Angeles
Times for more than twenty years. Shortly before the publication of this book,
he moved to South
Asia ,
where he trains other journalists in investigative reporting.
Their book
is the culmination of an investigation that began in 2005. Its origin was a
series of articles published in the Los Angeles Times between 2005 and 2007. But many
aspects could not be explored in the newspaper articles, and therefore the
authors decided to write a more comprehensive account, which was published in
2011.
The book is
well-written and well-researched. The authors provide some basic historical
background, such as the UNESCO convention of 1970. They also provide some
historical context, for instance the controversial episode concerning the
Euphronios krater and the Metropolitan Museum of Art.
J. Paul
Getty (1892-1976), the founder of the museum, is presented in chapter 1.
Jiri Frel (1923-2006),
the first curator of the antiquities collection, was hired by Getty himself in
1973. His almost incredible career is covered in chapter 2. His amazing departure from
the museum (1984-1986) is covered in chapter 3.
Marion True
(born 1948), the second curator, was hired in 1986 and asked to resign in 2005.
Several chapters are devoted to her career (the rise and fall of Marion True). When we read the book, we discover
that this curator had two faces: the official face said the Getty and other
American museums should stop buying (and accepting) ancient objects which had
been looted. The official face was very vocal on this point. But the unofficial face (which only appeared behind closed doors)
was ready to buy (and accept) any ancient object, as long as it was beautiful
and valuable. The question of looting was not relevant. Here are two examples:
(1) In 1992 a funerary wreath was offered to the
museum. The official face turned down the offer saying it was “too dangerous for
us” to handle. A few months later the unofficial face decided to buy the object,
and in 1993 the acquisition was confirmed by the board (pp. 121-122).
(2) In 1995
the official face was instrumental in setting up a new and strict policy
regarding acquisitions. The Getty would not no longer buy or accept anything
that was looted. Shortly after this the Fleischman collection was offered to
the museum. Most items in this collection were beautiful and looted. How would
the Getty respond to this offer? Would they focus on the looting and say no, or
would they focus on the beauty and say yes? The unofficial face discovered a
loophole in the new policy: the Getty would not buy or accept any objects which
had not been published; fortunately, the Fleischman collection had just been
published, and therefore the offer could be accepted. Who was the
publisher? The Getty! (pp. 140-145).
In 2005 the
Italian authorities opened a case against True. The Getty paid for her legal
representation, even though they had fired her in 2005. The case dragged on for
years. It finally ended without a verdict in 2010, when an Italian court
decided the statute of limitations had expired.
However, long
before the case came to an end, American museums started to give back some of
their “hot” items. The Met returned several items to Italy , including the Euphronios krater it
had bought in 1972. The Museum of Fine Arts in Boston did something similar. The Getty also
returned some items to Greece and some to Italy . The statue of Aphrodite became a
symbol of the conflict between the American museum and the source country. In
2011 the statue was returned to Sicily . As the last line of the last
chapter says, “The chase is finally over.”
Chasing
Aphrodite is based on a wide range of evidence: (1) interviews with many of
the persons who are portrayed in the book; (2) numerous photos of ancient
objects taken by the looters themselves; (3) numerous internal documents from
the Getty. Since the items in categories (2) and (3) were never meant to be
seen by the public, their credibility is extremely high.
On the dust
jacket of the hardcover version there are statements by five authors who have
covered similar topics. For reasons of space I can quote only one of them here:
Roger
Atwood, author of Stealing History, says:
“A brilliantly told, richly detailed, and vitally important account of how one ofAmerica ’s top cultural institutions spent
millions buying treasures stolen from ancient graves and then spent millions
more trying to deny it. Even if you think you know the story of the Getty, read
this book. You won’t know whether to laugh or cry, but you will be enthralled.”
“A brilliantly told, richly detailed, and vitally important account of how one of
Statements
like these are composed in order to promote the sale of the book, but in this
case there is no exaggeration. This book is the first full-scale study to give
the inside story of the Getty Museum , and I have to say that the authors
really know how to captivate an audience: as soon as you have finished one
chapter, you will want to continue with the next one. That is how good it is.
PS # 1.
James Cuno - author of Who Owns Antiquity? - is mentioned briefly on page 301. In May 2011 (after this book went to press) it was announced that he
was going to be the new CEO of the Getty Trust.
PS # 2. For information about the classical collection in the Getty Museum see my blog: A Museum in Los Angeles
No comments:
Post a Comment