Wednesday, June 17, 2026

Birth of a Family (2017)

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Birth of a Family

 

This documentary film premiered in 2017. The topic is the Canadian government program known as the Sixties Scoop and the consequences of this program.

 

The popular name of this program is highly misleading. It started before the 1960s, and it continued long after the 1960s. It began in 1951, and continued until 1990.

 

What was happening when this program was active?

 

Young children were removed from their indigenous families after which they were placed with white foster families or they were adopted by white families.

 

This program targeted toddlers and infants. The Canadian authorities wanted to catch the children while they were young.

 

The Canadian authorities did not want children who were 10 years old, or more, because these children would have a clear memory of the time with the indigenous families.

 

The purpose was to erase the indigenous memory. The Canadian authorities wanted the children to grow up in a white family and to have only white memories.

 

*****

 

This film covers the history of the government program and its consequences by focusing on one specific case: one family whose members were victims of the Sixties Scoop.

 

Mary Jane Adam was an indigenous woman who was born in Canada in 1934.

 

As a child, she was a victim of the residential school system which was active for more than a century: from 1883 to 1996.

 

As an adult, she gave birth to four children: three girls and one boy, but she never saw them grow up, because they were taken from her, one by one, shortly after they were born:

 

** Betty Ann (the oldest) was taken in 1961

** Esther was also taken in 1961

** Rosalie (Rose) was taken in 1963

** Ben (the youngest) was taken in 1965

 

The four siblings were never together while they were children, because they were taken one by one shortly after they were born.

 

The four siblings were placed in four different locations.

 

Mary Jane did not know where her children were placed.

 

Each of the four siblings did not know anything about the other three, because they had never been together as children.

 

Betty Ann and Rose met each other briefly in 1973 or 1974, during a gathering7 of numerous children.

 

A social worker told Betty Ann that Rose was her sister. At that time, Betty Ann was 14 or 15, while Rose was 11 or 12. They talked, but after this brief meeting they lost contact with each other.

 

In 1978, when Betty Ann was 19, she worked for a dentist. In this job she had access to hospital records.

 

When she found her own file, she learned that her mother Mary Jane was the mother of four children. She only knew the names. There was no address. There was no telephone number.

 

During the following years she tried to locate her mother. She located Mary Jane in 1985. She sent a letter to her. Mary Jane replied. They exchanged letters for a while. In 1990, she met Mary Jane. Mother and daughter were face to face for the first time since 1961.

 

When Betty Ann met her mother, Mary Jane could confirm that she was the mother of four children.

 

Betty Ann was the only one of the four siblings who met the mother after the moment when they were taken from her in the 1960s.

 

Mary Jane died in 2006. Two years later, in 2008, the Canadian prime minister Stephen Harper gave a public speech in which he made an official apology for sending children of indigenous families to residential schools.

 

Inspired by the official apology, Betty Ann managed to track down Rose and reconnect with her. She also resumed her search for the two remaining siblings: Esther and Ben. And this time she was successful. Ben was located in 2012, while Esther was located in 2014.

 

Now all four siblings were in contact with each other. They planned a family union to be held in 2015.

 

The plan said:

 

# 1. Fly to Calgary

# 2. Rent a car and drive to Banff, which is a famous holiday resort

# 3. Stay together in a rented house for one week

 

Before the family union, Betty Ann told one of her colleagues about the plan: the four siblings would be together for the first time in their lives.

 

The colleague said to her:

“This moment will be very important for you. How are you going to document it?”

 

Betty Ann said: 

“Maybe I will write a book about it one day.”

 

The colleague said:

“No! You must make a video of this historical moment.”

 

Betty Ann agreed. But who could do this? And who would do this? After a while, she found the answer: Tasha Hubbard was the perfect choice. Why?

 

Because she is an indigenous filmmaker and because she was also a victim of the Sixties Scoop. She knew exactly how important this moment would be for the four siblings.

 

*****

 

When the film begins, we see Betty Ann in Calgary airport. She is waiting for the other three siblings to arrive. One by one they arrive and greet each other. When all four are together, they get in the car and drive to Banff.

 

They move into the rented house where they will stay together for one week. Tasha Hubbard follows them around. In the house and when they are exploring the sights in Banff.

 

Sometimes we see all four together, sometimes we see only two, and occasionally only one person is talking directly to the camera.

 

They talk about the past and the present. They try to explain how they feel about the past and how they feel about the present.

 

The family union in Banff is an emotional time. All four siblings are together for the first time in their lives.

 

They are happy and sad at the same time.

 

They are happy to be together now, but they are sad that they had to wait fifty years for this moment. They are happy that all four siblings were placed with a nice family, but they are sad that they were taken away from their indigenous family.

 

*****

 

What do reviewers say about this film?

Here are two answers:

 

** 73 percent = IMDb

** 80 percent = Letterboxd

 

As you can see, the ratings are quite good. In my opinion, they are not good enough. The topic is important. The story about the tragic consequences of the Sixties Scoop deserves to be told. In this film, it is done very well.

 

I want to go all the way to the top with this product. I think it deserves a rating of five stars (100 percent).

  

REFERENCES

The following reviews are positive but do not offer a specific rating

 

Pat Mullen,

"Birth of a Family - Review,"

POV Magazine

27 April 2017

 

Derek Jacobs

"Birth of a Family - Review,"

Cinema Axis

02 May 2017

 

*****


 

Four indigenous siblings are together 

for the first time in their lives

in Banff, in September 2015.

From the left: Esther, Rose, Betty Ann, and Ben

 

*****

 


Wednesday, June 10, 2026

The Last Daughter (2022)

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Last Daughter

 

This documentary film premiered in 2022. The topic is the Australian government program which is known as the Stolen Generations and its consequences.

 

It began in 1910 and ended in 1969. But the official end was not the real end. Some social workers continued the program into the 1970s.

 

The time frame runs from 1910 to 1975, a period of 65 years. Since a generation is usually defined as 25-30 years, the program was in action for at least two generations.

 

What was happening when this program was in action?

 

Young children were removed from their indigenous family after which they were placed with a white foster family or they were adopted by a white family.

 

*****

 

This film covers the history of the government program by focusing on one person who was a victim of the program: Brenda Matthews who was born as Brenda Simon.

 

** What happened to her?

** What is her story?

 

Brenda’s parents had seven children. Brenda had six siblings. In 1973, all seven children were taken by the social workers.

 

No explanation was offered. The social workers might say the children were neglected. This claim could be used as a reason to remove them from their parents.

 

The seven children were placed in seven different locations. The Australian authorities did not want the siblings to stay together. In that case, they might form a strong bond and they might resist the official plan to make them forget the indigenous world.

 

The government wanted to erase the indigenous element inside them. The government wanted them to grow up in a white environment and to have white memories.

 

Brenda was born in late 1970. In early 1973, when she and her siblings were taken, she was only two years old.

 

Brenda was placed with a white family, Connie and Mac Ockers, who already had two children: a boy (Eugene) and a girl (Rebecca), who was almost the same age as Brenda.

 

Brenda lived with the foster family for five years (1973-1978). She was close to Rebecca. She got along with the parents. The parents liked her.

 

The social worker told Connie and Mac that Brenda's father was an alcoholic. This was the reason why she had been removed from her parents.

 

Connie and Mac opened their home to help and support Brenda. They did not know (and they could not know) that the social worker had lied about Brenda's father. He was not an alcoholic.

 

Connie and Mac liked Brenda so much that they wanted to adopt her. Around 1977, they filed an application for an adoption. But in 1978, the application was denied.

 

In that year, the social worker told Connie and Mac that Brenda was going back to her own family. The social worker gave them the address and told them to drive Brenda back to her home.

 

Connie and Mac were confused, because no explanation was offered. But they did what the social worker told them to do. In 1978, Brenda was returned to her biological father and mother.

 

Brenda was also confused. Nobody explained anything to her. She was just told that she was going back to her own family.

 

Brenda's life was turned upside down two times within five years:

 

** The first time in 1973, when she was placed with the white foster family, the Ockers

** The second time in 1978, when was returned to her own family

 

She had to adjust to a huge transformation two times within five years.

 

Just when she was getting used to living with the Ockers, she was sent back to her own family. This was her own family but she did not know them at all.

 

In 1978, when she was sent back to her own family, she felt like a stranger. She did not know her parents. She did not know her siblings.

 

She was told that all her siblings had also been removed in 1973. When the parents complained, the six siblings were returned in three stages:

 

** Siblings 1 and 2 were allowed to return

** Siblings 3 and 4 were allowed to return

** Siblings 5 and 6 were allowed to return

 

Brenda was the last of the seven children who was allowed to return to the parents. Hence the title of the film, The Last Daughter.

 

*****

 

In this film, we follow the story from 1973 to 1978. The early years of Brenda’s life.

 

In this film, we see some reconstructed moments of her life when she was a child. Obviously, there was no camera around to film these moments of her childhood. But many photos from that time have been preserved and they are used in the film.

 

The story does not end in 1978. This is, in fact, only the beginning of the story. In this film, we meet Brenda as an adult as well as her parents. We also meet the foster parents Connie and Mac. And these scenes are not reconstructions. They are real. How did this happen?

 

As an adult, Brenda decided that she was going to make a film about her life. Making this film about her life was a way for her to find herself. It was the road to a process of healing.

 

This film is made by Brenda and an associate named Nathaniel Schmidt.

 

In 1978, when Brenda was returned to her family, she had to adjust to a new situation. She had to find a way to settle in. She had to get to know her parents and her siblings.

 

This was not all. There was more. She asked herself: “Who am I? What is my identity?”

 

She had some vague memories of her life with the white family. Her friend Rebecca. But nothing was clear.

 

She had to find herself. She could not let it go. But she was not sure how to proceed.

 

As an adult, she worked with a white man Mark Matthews who organised cultural camps for young people.

 

Mark and Brenda got along quite well. After a while, they had a romantic relationship. After a while, they got married.

 

Mark knew that Brenda was bothered by something in her past. But he did not know what it was. When she tried to explain it to him, he said if you are bothered by something in the past, perhaps you have to go back and find out what it was.

 

Brenda began to search for her past. She wanted to find Connie and Mac. She wanted to find Rebecca, if this was possible.

 

*****

 

In 2018, forty years after the separation in 1978, she met Connie and Mac again. Sadly, she could not meet Rebecca, because she died a few years before this meeting. The situation was very emotional. But the mood was positive.

 

Connie and Mac had a question about Brenda's father: was he still an alcoholic?

 

Brenda was shocked when they asked this question. She told them her father had never been an alcoholic. She asked: why do you ask this question?

 

They explained that this what they had been told in 1973. Now Brenda understood. The social worker had lied to them in order to explain why Brenda had been removed from her family.

 

It was good that they had asked this question. Because now the lie had been exposed.

 

Brenda had a question: Why did you send me away in 1978? Connie and Mac explained. We did not send you away. We were told to bring you back.

 

Brenda was relieved. She had felt rejected, because they had sent her back. Now she learned the truth. They loved her. They wanted to adopt her, but they were not allowed to do that.

 

Forty years after the separation, Brenda and her foster parents could get to know each other again.

 

*****

 

What do reviewers say about this film?

Here are some answers:

 

** 100 percent = Rotten Tomatoes (the critics)

** 100 percent = Rotten Tomatoes (the audience)

** 79 percent = IMDb

 

Eighteen user reviews are posted on the IMDb website. What do they say?

 

** 70 percent = one review

** 80 percent = one review

** 90 percent = one review

** 100 percent = fifteen reviews

 

I understand the numerous positive reviews and I agree with them. 

 

In my opinion, the positive reviews are well-deserved and fully justified. I think this product deserves a rating of five stars (100 percent).

 

This old black-and-white photo shows Rebecca and Brenda as children (ca. 1977)

 

 This photo shows the foster parents Connie and Mac Ockers

 

This photo shows Nana Simon, Brenda's mother

 

REFERENCE

 

Luke Buckmaster,

“The Last Daughter - Review,”

The Guardian

15 June 2023

 

*****