AD 410:
The Year
That Shook Rome
Sam Moorhead and David Stuttard have written a book about the sack of
** Sam Moorhead is National Finds Advisor for Iron Age and Roman coins in the Department of Portable Antiquities and Treasure at the
** David Stuttard has taught classics and published his own translations and adaptations of Greek tragedies, which he has directed in the
Their book begins with a brief presentation of the main characters: “Dramatis Personae.” The main text is divided into five acts. Here is an overview:
PROLOGUE - Preface and
Chapter 1: Rome , the eternal city
PART 1 - A
HOUSE DIVIDED - Chapters
2-3
PART 2 - THE
STORM CLOUDS GATHER - Chapters
4-6
PART 3 - THE
SACK OF ROME - Chapters
7-10
EPILOGUE - Chapter 11
and Aftermath: Rome AD 410-575
At the end
of the book there is a reference section where we find the following items:
- Who’s Who in AD 410
-
Ancient
sources
-
Further
reading
-
Endnotes
-
Timeline
753 BC-AD 711
-
Maps
-
Index
-
Picture
credits
[Sam
Moorhead specializes in coins. Perhaps this is why 13 illustrations show coins
and why nine illustrations show medallions.]
This account
is based on ancient sources and modern scholarship. Throughout the eleven chapters Moorhead and Stuttard quote extensively from
ancient sources. This is a good idea, because it gives the reader a chance to learn
what some of the ancient writers had to say about this or that person, about
this or that topic.
As you can
see from the table of contents, the authors do not only cover the main topic -
the sack of Rome in AD 410 - they also tell us what happened before and after. In this
way the dramatic event is placed in a historical context.
The
character sketches in the beginning and at the end of the book are useful for
the general reader, who is not a specialist in Roman history.
The authors
provide a lot of information. It is quite an accomplishment to be able to
present so much information in a book which has only 184 pages.
According
to the publisher, this book “paints a vibrant and illuminating portrayal of ordinary
individuals grappling with an extraordinary crisis at a defining moment in our
history.”
I agree. The
text is well written. The authors pay attention to the details as well as the grand
picture. In fact, this book is great, but I have to mention a few cases which bother me:
(1) On page
52 (at the end of chapter 3) they describe the death of Constantine in AD 337 and then they end the chapter
with following words:
“InRome , the Senate, still predominantly
pagan, passed a decree proclaiming Constantine a god. Fifty-seven years later,
in 394, no such decree would follow the death of Theodosius.”
“In
But
Theodosius died in 395, as stated in the chronology on page 176, so the number of years between the two events is 58.
(2) Most
illustrations are relevant and well-chosen – but there is at least one exception: on
page 59 the authors mention an event in 376 where some Gothic youths are sold as
slaves. They provide a reference to the Roman historian Ammianus Marcellinus
(note 37), which is fine. But they also refer to illustration # 4.4 on the same
page. This picture shows a detail of the Septimius Severus Arch in the Roman
Forum. How can this
arch, dedicated in 202, document something which happened in 376, almost two
hundred years later?
(3) On page
167 (in the section about the ancient sources) they present Procopius and claim
that his work History of the Wars was written “c.551-553.” This is not
quite correct. As far as I know, books 1-4 were completed 548-549; books 5-7
were completed in 551; while book 8 was completed 553-554.
(4) On page
168 (in the same section) they claim that Synesius lived “c.373-c.414” and that
he was born at Ptolemais in Cyrenaica (eastern Libya ). At the end of the presentation
they refer to a well-known website - Livius.org - which includes a section about Synesius.
But the website gives the traditional dates for Synesius (ca. 370-ca. 413) and
tells us that he was born in Cyrene , and that he died in Ptolemais, which is true. In other words:
the authors recommend a website, but they do not quote it accurately.
[For more information
about Synesius see James Carpenter Nicol, Synesius of Cyrene: His Life and Writings (1887, reprinted 2007). For a recent account see Jay Bregman, Synesius of Cyrene (1982).]
(5) The Altar of Victory is mentioned several times. When was it removed from the senate house in Rome? Page 160 (the brief biography of Symmachus) says it happened in AD 382, and the timeline on page 176 gives the same date. But the caption to illustration # 8.5 on page 113 claims it happened in 384-385. Why this discrepancy? Why do the authors not give the same date every time? This is most unfortunate.
[For more information about the Altar see Simon James, Rome & the Sword (2011), pp. 120 and 243.]
(6) “Further
reading” (pp. 169-170) is divided into five sections. In the section about
“The Later Roman Empire” I miss Kenneth G. Holum, Theodosian Empresses: Woman and Imperial Dominion in Late Antiquity (hardcover 1982, paperback 1989).
In the
section about “Constantine and Early Christianity” I miss Paul Stephenson, Constantine: Christian Victor, Unconquered Emperor
(hardcover 2009, paperback 2011). Perhaps it was published to late to be included here?
In the
section about “Barbarians and Early Medieval History” I miss Alan Cameron, Barbarians and Politics at the Court of Arcadius (1993).
Hagith
Sivan, Galla Placidia: The Last Roman Empress was published in 2011, so Moorhead and Stuttard could not possibly have
included it in their book, but I will mention it anyway, because it is highly relevant for the topic.
These flaws
are minor and they are the exception. If I decide to forget about them, I can say that AD 410 is a great book about an important
event, which deserves to be read by everyone who is interested in Roman
history.
No comments:
Post a Comment