Matrona Docta:
Educated women in the Roman elite
from Cornelia to Julia Domna
Emily A. Hemelrijk is a lecturer in the department of history at the University of Utrecht. The hardcover version of her book was published in 1999; the paperback version appeared in 2004. The main text is divided into six chapters (fortunately, each chapter is divided into shorter sections by several subheadings). Here are the chapter headings:
1. The
social position of upper-class women
2. The
education of upper-class women: opportunities and impediments
3. The
education of upper-class women: aims and opinions
4. Patronesses
of literature and learning
5. Women
and writing: poetry
6. Women
and writing: prose
The scope of
this study is explained on page 2: the time frame is the second century BC to
AD 235. As for geography and language, the focus is on educated women in Rome and Italy , occasionally also on upper-class women
of the Latin-speaking western provinces, while “women of the Greek-speaking
eastern provinces and Christian women are excluded.” As we shall see below, this
promise is not always kept.
Hemelrijk
got some good reviews. On the back cover of the paperback version there are
excerpts from four reviews of the hardcover version. Here are two examples:
BRYN MAWR
CLASSICAL REVIEW:
“An exemplary and thorough study of the subject.”
“An exemplary and thorough study of the subject.”
GNOMON:
“The author gives proof of sound judgement and sobriety in her way of formulating criteria and providing arguments. She displays a good critical eye in the handling of sources.”
“The author gives proof of sound judgement and sobriety in her way of formulating criteria and providing arguments. She displays a good critical eye in the handling of sources.”
I agree.
The review
in Bryn Mawr Classical Review is written by Holt N. Parker from the University of Cincinnati (2002.07.32). Parker begins and ends with a positive
statement, but in between there are several critical remarks. The first two are
quite serious, while the last two are minor disagreements:
# 1: The
layout of the book chosen by the publisher means that “the book is rendered quite
difficult to use.” There are 219 pages of text followed by 138 pages of notes.
But notes should be footnotes, not endnotes!
# 2: The
structure of the book chosen by the author causes too many repetitions: Cornelia
(mother of the Gracchi) is discussed no less than nine times from nine
different angles!
# 3: On
page 49 Hemelrijk claims that “short and personal poetry, chiefly elegiac
epigram, was the genre women chose when writing themselves.” To this Parker says: “No,
that’s all that’s come down to us.”
# 4: Regarding
the framework Parker says: “Hemelrijk rightly excludes Christianity, but
Perpetua keeps sneaking in.” Vibia Perpetua, a Christian martyr from North Africa , is mentioned four times in the
text and two times in the notes.
[For more
information about this woman see Thomas J. Hefferman, The Passion of Perpetua
and Felicity (2012).]
I agree with these objections raised by Parker, and I want to add two more, which he does not mention:
(A) Illustrations
are not exactly the strong side of this book. There are merely five black-and-white
illustrations, none of which shows a woman whose name we know. Many portraits
and statues of ancient women are preserved until today. Not one of them is
shown in this book: even when it is possible, Hemelrijk fails to put a face to
the persons discussed in her book.
(B) Vindolanda
is mentioned four times - two times in the text (pp. 188, 191) and two times in
the notes (p. 235 note 49, p. 345 note 14) - but not listed in the index. Hadrian’s Wall is added in two of the four cases,
but not listed in the index either. Each time Hemelrijk places the Roman fort and
the Roman wall “in northern Britain ,” which is not true. Vindolanda is
near Hadrian’s
Wall in
northern England , not far from the modern border
between England and Scotland .
A large
number of ancient women are presented in this book. Here are some of the main
characters:
** Cornelia
(mother of the Gracchi) is discussed nine times (as explained above). A
full-scale study is available now: Suzanne Dixon, Cornelia: Mother of the
Gracchi (Routledge, 2007)
** Terentia (first wife ofCicero ), Tullia (daughter of Cicero ), and Publilia (second wife of Cicero ) are mentioned several times. A
full-scale study is available now: Susan Treggiari, Terentia, Tullia and Publilia:
The Women of Cicero’s Family (Routledge, 2007)
** Terentia (first wife of
** Livia (third wife of Augustus and mother of Tiberius) is mentioned several times. Two books are available now: A. A. Barrett, Livia: First Lady of Imperial Rome (Yale, 2002) and Matthew Dennison, Empress of Rome: The Life of Livia (2010, 2011)
** Julia (daughter
of Augustus) is mentioned several times. A full-scale study is available now: Elaine
Fantham, Julia Augusti (Routledge, 2006)
** Poppaea Sabina
(second wife of Nero), Agrippina Minor (last wife of Claudius and mother of
Nero), and Domitia Longina (wife of Domitian) – “the wicked women” - are
discussed on pp. 113-116.
** Vibia Sabina
(wife of Hadrian), Plotina, (wife of Trajan), and Matidia the Younger (sister
or half-sister of Sabina) – “the modest women” - are discussed on pp. 116-122.
** Julia Domna
(wife of Septimius Severus and the mother of Caracalla and Geta) is discussed on pp. 122-127. A full-scale study of this empress is available now: Barbara
Levick, Julia Domna: Syrian Empress (Routledge, 2007)
** Julia
Balbilla (companion of Vibia Sabina) is discussed on pp. 164-170. She is
from Commagene, one of the eastern provinces, and her poems, which are
inscribed on the Egyptian Colossus of Memnon, are written in Greek. She falls outside
the scope of this study, but is included anyway because of "the firmly Roman context of her (Greek) poetry" (p. 324 note 35). Her
poems are translated into English in Ian Michael Plant (editor), Women Writers
of Ancient Greece and Rome (2004).
Matrona
Docta is, in Parker’s view, “a solid and extremely useful survey of what we
know, what we think we know, and what little we can know” about educated women
in ancient Rome . I agree. But it has some flaws, and therefore I cannot give it more
than four stars.
No comments:
Post a Comment