Friday, July 31, 2026

Heinrich Schliemann and the search for ancient Troy

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Heinrich Schliemann (1822–1890) was a German businessman who became an archaeologist, because he was fascinated with the famous poems the Iliad and the Odyssey by the ancient Greek poet Homer.

 

He conducted several excavations at Hisarlik in Asia Minor, which is the site of ancient Troy (1870-1890)

 

He also conducted some excavations at Mycenae, which is located in Greece (1874-1876)

 

Was he ever guilty of:

** Lies

** Fraud

** Forgery

In connection with his work as an archaeologist?

 

The answer to this question is yes:

 

He told lies, he committed fraud, and he practiced forgery while working as an archaeologist in Greece and in the Ottoman Empire

 

Here are some examples:

 

# 1. The discovery of Troy's location. He did not discover the location of Troy. He listened to the English amateur archaeologist Frank Calvert, who knew where to dig, because he had read the book by the Scottish journalist Charles Maclaren, which was published in 1822.

 

# 2. His method of excavation was brutal and ruthless. He was a treasure hunter looking for items made of gold and silver. Ordinary items were discarded or destroyed, because they were regarded as worthless.

 

# 3. His autobiography was improved and embellished, because he wanted to make his life seem impressive to his readers.

 

# 4. While digging at Hisarlik, he realised that the ancient city had several layers like a cake. Since he wanted to reach the level associated with the Trojan war, he destroyed the upper levels.

 

When he found an item in one layer, he would sometimes say he found it in another later, because this suited his preconceived ideas about the Trojan war.

 

# 5. Sometimes he planted an item he had bought at a local market and later pretended to find this item while he was digging. This item would then be announced as a precious discovery.

 

# 6. Sometimes he fabricated the circumstances of a discovery.

 

# 7. He smuggled several items away from the archaeological zone, because he did not want to share them with the government of the Ottoman Empire, as he had promised when he was given a permit to conduct excavations.

 

*****

 

Heinrich Schliemann is known as the father of modern archaeology, but his legacy is a combination of negative and positive elements.

 

He is loved and hated, because of the way in which he conducted his archaeological excavations.

 

He took full credit for the work which had been done by others. His work at Hisarlik was based on the studies by Charles Maclaren and the inspections made by Frank Calvert, but he did not want to give them any credit for their contributions.

 

He had the money and he had the permit. He had the power to control the excavations as well as the information which was released to the public about the excavations.

 

For many years, the names Charles Maclaren and Frank Calvert were unknown to the public, because Heinrich Schliemann presented himself as the clever man who single-handedly had found and excavated the ancient city of Troy.

 

*****

 

REFERENCES

 

Myth, Scandal and History

By William Calder III & David A. Traill

(1986)

 

Schliemann of Troy:

Treasure and Deceit

By David A. Traill

(1995)

 

Finding the Walls of Troy: Frank Calvert and Heinrich Schliemann at Hisarlik

By Susan Heuck Allen

(1999)

 

Schliemann's Silent Partner -

Frank Calvert (1828-1908): 

Pioneer, Scholar and Survivor

By Marcelle Robinson

(2006)

 

*****

 

The German businessman

Heinrich Schliemann 

(1822-1890)

 

*****

 

The English amateur archaeologist

Frank Calvert

(1828-1908)

 

*****


The Scottish journalist

Charles Maclaren

(1782-1866)

 

*****

 

 

Athens: Birth of Democracy (2026)

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Athens: Birth of Democracy 

 

This documentary film premiered on US television (PBS) in April 2026. It is an episode of the long-running program NOVA which focuses on the history of science and technology.

 

Here is some basic information about it:

 

** Writer and director: Florence Tran

** Narrator: David Coburn

** Run time: 53 minutes

** Rating on IMDb: 77 percent

 

Athens, the capital of Greece, is often described as the place where democracy was born. This film explains how and why this happened. This film investigates the history of democracy in ancient Athens:

 

** How was Athens ruled before the introduction of democracy?

** Who were the rulers of Athens before the introduction of democracy?

** How and why was democracy introduced in Athens?

** What was the meaning of democracy in ancient Athens?

** How was democracy practiced in ancient Athens?

** What were the positive and the negative aspects of democracy in Athens?

** How long did the ancient democracy last?

** How and why did democracy end in Athens?

 

These and other questions are discussed in the film. The answers are supported by information about ancient sources and by reference to some recent archaeological discoveries.

 

An ancient voting machine has been reconstructed and in the film, the archaeologists demonstrate how it could work in practice.

 

A large amount of information about democracy in ancient Athens is presented in less than one hour.

 

The presentation is clear and easy to understand. The interpretation of the historical evidence is convincing.

 

If you are interested in the history of the ancient world, in particular the history of Athenian democracy, this film is definitely something for you.

 

It is highly recommended.

 

***** 

 


 

This is a fragment of an ancient voting machine 

(kleroterion)

 

 


 

This is a modern reconstruction of an ancient voting machine (kleroterion)

 


 

Athens: Birth of Democracy

NOVA, April 2026

53 minutes

 

*****