Saturday, July 29, 2023

The Trials of J. Robert Oppenheimer (2009)

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Trials of J. Robert Oppenheimer is a documentary film which premiered on US television (PBS) in 2009.

 

It is an episode of the long-running program American Experience.

 

Here is some basic information about this film:

 

** Written, produced and directed by David Grubin

** Narrated by Campbell Scott

** Language: English

** Run time: 95 minutes

 

American scientist J. R. Oppenheimer is known as “the father of the atomic bomb.”

 

During World War II, he was the director of the top-secret facility at Los Alamos, New Mexico, a part of the Manhattan Project to develop the atomic bomb.

 

During the first few years after the war, he was regarded as a hero, but a few years later - during the Second Red Scare (1947-1957) - he was criticized because of his connections to communists or communist-sympathizers.

 

His loyalty to the USA was questioned and his security clearance was revoked as a result of a hearing held behind closed doors in 1954 and after that he was a broken man.

 

This film is the story of his life.

 

The participants

Several persons are interviewed in the film.

 

Here are the names of the participants:

 

The first group

** Marvin L. Goldberger (1922-2014) - physicist

** Herbert F. York (1921-2009) - physicist

** Robert Christy (1916-2012) - physicist

** Harold M. Agnew (1921-2013) - physicist

** Freeman Dyson (1923-2020) - physicist

 

The second group

** Roy J. Glauber (1925-2018) - physicist

** Richard Rhodes (born 1937) - writer

** Martin J. Sherwin (1937-2021) - historian

** Priscilla J. McMillan (1928-2021) - writer

** Jeremy Bernstein (born 1929) - writer

 

Historical advisors:

*** Richard Rhodes

*** Martin J. Sherwin

 

As you can see from the list above, many of the people who are interviewed in the film are no longer alive. It is fortunate that their statements and their memories have been preserved in this film.

 

Marvin L. Goldberger summarizes what happened to Oppenheimer with the following words:

 

“The country asked him to do something [that was difficult but important] and he did it brilliantly, and they paid him for the tremendous job by breaking him.”

 

Part one

This film follows the life of Julius Robert Oppenheimer from the beginning to the end. From the beginning in 1904 until the end in 1967.

 

His life can be divided into three phases:

 

# 1. The time before WW II

# 2. The time during WW II

# 3. The time after WW II

 

The second phase was much shorter than the first and the last, but in retrospect we can see that it was the most important of the three phases. The time when he was the director of the top-secret facility at Los Alamos in New Mexico was the defining moment of his life.

 

The film is composed of three elements:

 

# 1. Interviews with historical and scientific experts.

# 2. Archive footage, photos and film. These items are mostly in black-and-white.

# 3. Re-enactment of the hearing which took place in 1954. These scenes are in colour.

 

An on-screen message placed at the beginning of the film states:

 

“The words spoken in the courtroom in this documentary are taken directly from the transcript of the hearing in the matter of J. Robert Oppenheimer.”

 

The re-enactment of the hearing has a prominent place in the film, because it was a turning point in his life.

 

The role of Oppenheimer is played by the actor David Strathairn, who had (incidentally) played this character once before: in the television movie Day One aka Hiroshima.

 

This movie, which premiered in 1989, was released on DVD in 2001.

 

Oppenheimer was a controversial and enigmatic character. He was a brilliant scientist and an able administrator, but he lacked social skills.

 

He had many colleagues, but not many personal friends. During his career, he also made enemies, not only in the FBI and among politicians but also in the world of science.

 

This film focuses on two persons who played a significant role in his downfall: Edward Teller (1908-2003) and Lewis Strauss (1896-1974).

 

Part two

Oppenheimer was never accused of breaking the law. The hearing held behind closed doors in 1954 was not a trial. He was not accused of committing a crime. But his loyalty was questioned.

 

The purpose of the hearing was to determine if his security clearance should be revoked. But the hearing seemed like a trial with a prosecutor who interrogated him for almost four weeks. 

 

When the hearing was over, his security clearance was revoked. His enemies wanted to break him and in a way they succeeded.

 

He did not lose his life or his liberty, but he lost his security clearance and after this moment in time, his life was never the same again.

 

Army Intelligence had him under surveillance while he worked on the Manhattan Project. The FBI had him under surveillance before and after World War II because of his contacts with communists or communist-sympathizers.

 

Had they ever caught him breaking the law, we can be sure they would have used this fact against him. But they never claimed he had done anything illegal. This is a clear sign that it never happened.

 

The charge against him was about morals. His enemies found it immoral to meet with a communist, even if it was not illegal.

 

Oppenheimer had contacts with several communists, as the film explains. His first girlfriend, his wife, and his brother were all communists.

 

But he did not want to abandon them just because of their political opinions. He was perhaps a bit naïve on this point. He did not understand the power of the forces that he was up against.

 

Oppenheimer was asked to build the atomic bomb and he did it. But once the work had been done, he began to have doubts about it:

 

Was it right to build the bomb? Was it right to build more and more bombs? Should the US try to maintain a monopoly on nuclear power or should the knowledge be available to the whole world?

 

His enemies did not want to discuss such questions.

 

They said asking such questions was unpatriotic.

 

The US had the nuclear bomb in 1945. The USSR was not far behind. They had it in 1949. 

 

Teller wanted to build an H-bomb. But Oppenheimer had been against it, because he saw it as a weapon of mass destruction.

 

Teller was able to convince President Truman and he got what he wanted. The US had the H-bomb in 1952. Once again, the USSR was not far behind. They had it in 1953. 

 

A dangerous arms race between the superpowers was beginning. Precisely what Oppenheimer had feared.

 

According to this film, the 1954 hearing was a turning point not only for Oppenheimer but also for the US and indeed the whole world.

 

The decision to remove Oppenheimer from the scientific community opened the door to a massive arms race which lasted for several decades.

 

In 1963, nine years after the hearing, Oppenheimer was awarded the Enrico Fermi award. The decision was made by President John F. Kennedy shortly before he was killed and the award was presented to Oppenheimer by President Lyndon Johnson.

 

In the film, it is suggested that this honour was some kind of apology for what had happened in 1954. Perhaps it was, but it did not really change anything.

 

He still did not have a security clearance, meaning he was still regarded as a security risk and a threat to national security.

 

David Grubin – writer, producer, and director of the film – does not appear in the film. But on the PBS website, on a special page devoted to the film, he explains why he thinks the story about Oppenheimer is important and relevant to the world of today:

 

“For me, the idea that the loyalty of one of our most distinguished scientists could be called into question and the rules of justice set aside, all justified because we were in a war against Communism, is a tragic reminder of how staunchly we must protect our freedoms, especially in perilous times.”

 

In December 2022, the US government announced that Oppenheimer’s security clearance had been posthumously restored.

 

The government explained that the decision which had been made in 1954, during the Cold War, was wrong.

 

Conclusion

This film is an excellent biography of Oppenheimer. His life and his work are covered in great detail. And the people who are interviewed are well-chosen.

 

It is a balanced account. Neither a total defense, nor a total attack. The film-makers present the facts, telling us what Oppenheimer did and said, allowing the viewers to draw their own conclusions.

 

Whether you like him or not, Oppenheimer played an important role at a crucial moment in the history of the United States. The story of his life and work deserves to be told, and in this film, it is done very well.

 

Most episodes of American Experience run for ca. 52 minutes, but there are exceptions to the rule. When a person or a topic is considered very important, the producers will make an episode longer.

 

Oppenheimer is an exception. This episode about his life and work runs for 95 minutes. This means the topic is covered in great detail.

 

If you are interested in the history of the modern world - in particular World War II, the Cold War, the question of human rights and political ideologies - this film is definitely something for you.

 

It is highly recommended.

 

PS # 1. What do reviewers say about this film?

On IMDb it has a rating of 73 percent.

On Amazon there are at the moment 27 ratings of this product, 12 with reviews. The average rating is 4.7 stars which corresponds to a rating of 94 percent.

In my opinion, the rating on IMDb is too low, while the rating on Amazon is more appropriate.

 

PS # 2. Oppenheimer: The Father of the Atomic Bomb is a miniseries in seven parts which premiered in the UK in 1980 and in the US in 1982.

 

It was released on DVD in 2006.

 

The American actor Sam Waterston plays the role of Oppenheimer in this drama.

 

PS # 3. Manhattan is a television series about the top-secret Manhattan Project during World War II.

 

** Season one = 2014 (13 episodes)

** Season two = 2015 (10 episodes)

 

While some characters in this show are real historical persons, most are fictional, and the show is not intended to maintain historical accuracy.

 

The role of Robert Oppenheimer (who is a minor character here) is played by Daniel London.

 

PS # 4. Books

 

** The Making of the Atomic Bomb by Richard Rhodes (1986) (2012)

** Racing for the Bomb: General Leslie R. Groves, the Manhattan Project’s Indispensable Man by Robert S. Norris (2002)

** Brotherhood of the Bomb: The Tangled Lives of Robert Oppenheimer, Ernest Lawrence, and Edward Teller by Gregg Herken (2002)

** Oppenheimer: Portrait of an Enigma by Jeremy Bernstein (2004) (2005)

** East Palace 109: Robert Oppenheimer and the Secret City of Los Alamos by Jennet Conant (2005)

** American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of Robert Oppenheimer by Kai Bird and Martin J. Sherwin (2005) (2006)

** The Ruin of J. Robert Oppenheimer and the Birth of the Modern Arms Race by Priscilla J. McMillan (2005) 

** Robert Oppenheimer: A Life Inside the Center by Ray Monk (2012)

 

PS # 5. Film and video

 

The Day after Trinity

A documentary film which premiered in 1981

** Director: Jon Else

** Run time: 88 minutes

** Rating on IMDb: 79 percent

** Rating on Rotten Tomatoes: 97 percent

 

Fat Man and Little Boy

A historical drama which premiered in 1989

** Run time: 127 minutes

 

Hiroshima and Nagasaki: 75 Years Later

A documentary film which premiered in 2020

** Run time: 79 minutes

 

To End All War: Oppenheimer & the Atomic Bomb

A documentary film which premiered in 2023

** Director: Christopher Cassel

** Run time: 87 minutes

 

Oppenheimer

A historical drama which premiered in 2023

** The Irish actor Cillian Murphy plays the role of Oppenheimer

** Writer and director: Christopher Nolan

** Based on the book American Prometheus by Kai Bird and Martin J. Sherwin (2005) (2006)

** Run time: 180 minutes

 

*****


The Trials of J. Robert Oppenheimer

A documentary film which

premiered on US television (PBS)

in 2009

 

*****



To End All War: Oppenheimer & the Atomic Bomb (2023)

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To End All War: Oppenheimer and the Atomic Bomb is a documentary film which premiered in 2023.

 

Here is some basic information about it:

 

** Director: Christopher Cassel

** Language: English

** Run time: 87 minutes

 

Many persons are interviewed in the film. Here are the names of the participants (in alphabetical order):

 

** Kai Bird – co-author of the book American Prometheus (2005)

 

** Alan Carr – senior historian, Los Alamos National Laboratory

 

** Jennet Conant – author of the book 109 East Palace (2005)

 

** David Eisenbach – professor of history, Columbia University

 

** Jon Else – filmmaker – director of the documentary film The Day After Trinity (1981)

 

** Gregg Herken – author of the book Brotherhood of the Bomb (2002)

 

** Dr Michio Kaku – theoretical physicist

 

** Christopher Nolan – filmmaker - director of the historical drama Oppenheimer (2023)

 

** Robert S. Norris – author of the book Racing for the Bomb (2002)

 

** Bill Nye – science educator

 

** Charles Oppenheimer – grandson of J. Robert Oppenheimer

 

** Ellen Bradbury Reid – daughter of a Los Alamos scientist

 

** Richard Rhodes – author the book The Making of the Atomic Bomb (1986)

 

** Dr Mareena Robinson Snowden – nuclear security expert

 

** Dr Hideko Tamura (born 1935) – Hiroshima survivor (age 10 in 1945)

 

** Alex Wellerstein – nuclear historian

 

Audio recordings of persons who are no longer alive are used on several occasions. Examples:

 

** Lt. General Leslie Groves (1896-1970) – director of the Manhattan project

** Martin J. Sherwin (1937-2021) – co-author of the book American Prometheus (2005)

 

J. Robert Oppenheimer was known among his friends as “Oppie.”

 

This film covers his life and career in great detail. From the beginning in 1904 to the end in 1967. His triumph as well as his tragedy. His career as a scientist is placed in a historical context and his legacy is considered.

 

Lt. General Leslie Groves was the director of the top-secret Manhattan project to build an atomic bomb.

 

Groves had to pick a scientist to be the director of the facility at Los Alamos (New Mexico) and he chose Oppenheimer for this position.

 

As the director of the facility at Los Alamos, New Mexico, his work was top-secret during World War II. But once the war was over, this project was no longer a big secret.

 

Oppenheimer was named as the scientist who had been in charge of the atomic project during the war. He became known as “the father of the atomic bomb.”

 

During the first few years after World War II, he was regarded as a hero. But after a while, his position was challenged and his loyalty was questioned.

 

In 1954, the Atomic Energy Commission held a hearing behind closed doors in order to determine if his security clearance should be revoked.

 

As explained in the film, Oppenheimer had been leaning to the left wing of the political spectrum before the war. 

 

His wife and his brother were members of the communist party. He had friends who were members of the communist party.

 

He did not want to abandon them because of the Cold War and because the Soviet Union was seen as a major enemy and a threat to world peace.

 

Oppenheimer was never accused of committing a crime, but his loyalty to the USA was questioned. When the hearing was over, his security clearance was revoked.

 

He lost neither his life nor his liberty, but when his security clearance was revoked, he was excluded from the scientific community of which he had been a prominent member.

 

His life was never the same as before. 

 

In 2022, more than fifty years after his death, the US government announced that his security clearance had been posthumously restored. 

 

The government explained that the decision which had been made in 1954, during the Cold War, was wrong.

 

What do reviewers say about this film?

 

On IMDb it has a rating of 78 percent.

 

On Rotten Tomatoes it has a rating of 89 percent (the audience)

 

At the moment, this film is not yet available on Amazon. 

 

This is why there is no rating. 

 

I understand the positive ratings. The participants are well-chosen. They offer many interesting and important observations.

 

But I feel that something is missing here: two aspects could and should have been explored.

 

# 1. Plutonium and Uranium

In August 1945, the US had completed two atomic bombs. One was based on plutonium, while the other one was based on uranium. This fact is not mentioned in the film.

 

The US dropped the first bomb on Hiroshima on 6 august 1945 and the second bomb on Nagasaki only three days later, 9 August 1945.

 

The US wanted to test both types under realistic conditions. This is why the US wanted to drop two bombs on Japan. This is why it was not enough for the US to drop one bomb. This detail is not explained in the film.

 

The interval between the two bombs was only three days. The US wanted to drop both bombs before the Japanese decided to surrender.

 

What if Japan had surrendered on 7 or 8 August? In that case, the US would have missed the chance to drop the second bomb.

 

The short interval between the two bombs is mentioned in the film, but the reason for the short interval is not explained.

 

# 2. The end of the war

One participant (Jon Else) says many people came to believe the atomic bomb had ended World War II. Having said this, he adds the following three words:

 

“Perhaps it had.”

 

But this statement is not followed up. It is left hanging in the air. There is a long-running discussion about this question: did the atomic bomb end the war?

 

Why did the Japanese government decide to surrender on 14 August 1945? Was it because the atomic bombs had forced the leaders to do so? Or was there some other reason for this decision? Was there another factor?

 

According to some historians, Japan decided to surrender, because the Soviet Union declared war on Japan and began to move towards the Japanese puppet state Manchukuo.

 

This interpretation is not mentioned in the film. No historian who supports this interpretation is presented in the film.

 

These details are neither mentioned nor discussed in the film. The failure to do so is a flaw which cannot be ignored.

 

This why the rating on IMDb is very appropriate. This product deserves a rating of four stars (80 percent).

 

REFERENCES

 

# 1. Books

 

The Making of the Atomic Bomb

By Richard Rhodes

1986

 

Brotherhood of the Bomb:

The Tangles Lives and Loyalties of Robert Oppenheimer, Ernest Lawrence, and Edward Teller

By Gregg Herken

2002

 

Racing for the Bomb:

The True Story of General Leslie R. Groves, the Man behind the Birth of the Atomic Age

By Robert S. Norris

2002

 

American Prometheus:

The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer

By Kai Bird and Martin J. Sherwin

2005

 

109 East Palace:

Robert Oppenheimer and the Secret City of Los Alamos

By Jennet Conant

2005

 

Oppenheimer:

A Life Inside the Center

By Ray Monk

2012

 

The General and the Genius: Groves and Oppenheimer - The Unlikely Partnership That Built the Atom Bomb

By James Kunetka

2022


# 2. Film and video

 

The Day After Trinity

A documentary

1981

 

The Atomic Café

A documentary

1982

 

Radio Bikini

A documentary

1988

 

Fat Man and Little Boy

A historical drama

1989

 

Trinity and Beyond:

The Atomic Bomb Movie

A documentary

1995

 

The Trials of J. Robert Oppenheimer

A documentary film which premiered on US television (PBS) in 2009.

It is an episode of the long-running program American Experience.

 

Hiroshima and Nagasaki: 75 Years Later

A documentary

2020

 

Oppenheimer

A historical drama

2023

 

*****

 

In December 2022, 

more than fifty years after his death,

Oppenheimer's security clearance was restored

This story was reported in the

New York Times,

23 April 2023


*****