Saturday, August 13, 2022

Mr. Tanimoto's Journey (2018)

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Tanimoto’s Journey is a documentary film which premiered on US television (PBS) in 2018.

 

It is an episode of a long-running series called Viewfinder (season 24 episode 4).

 

The story of the internment of the Japanese Americans during World War Two is told by focusing on the life and experience of one person: Jim Tanimoto, who was placed in the Tule Lake Relocation Center in the north of California.

 

Here is some basic information about this film:

 

** Producer and director: Jesse Dizard

** Available on the PBS website

** Language: English

** Subtitles: English

** Run time: 26 minutes

 

The story of Jim Tanimoto’s journey and the internment of the Japanese Americans is told by himself, by two members of his family, and by two academic experts. Here are the names of the participants:

 

** Jim Tanimoto (born 1923) – interned in Tule Lake Relocation Center during World War Two

 

** Judy Tanimoto – his daughter

 

** Jamie Lynn Gilmore-Wilson – his granddaughter

 

** Michael Magliari – Professor of History, California State University, Chico

 

** Sarah Pike – Professor of Comparative Religion, California State University, Chico

 

In February 1942, two months after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed Executive order 9066, which established an exclusion zone in the western part of the continental USA.

 

More than 111,000 Japanese Americans were evacuated from the exclusion zone and transported to ten relocation camps which were constructed in remote locations further inland.

 

More than half of them were American citizens, because they were born in the US. The others were Japanese immigrants who were (at the time) not allowed to become American citizens.

 

Members of the first generation are known as issei, while members of the second generation are known as nisei.

 

The Japanese Americans were not charged with anything. They were not convicted of anything.

 

According to the government, they were removed from the exclusion zone, because the government feared that they might be willing to commit a crime in the future.

 

They might be willing to commit acts of sabotage and acts of spying for Imperial Japan. There was no evidence of this, only suspicion and distrust. But suspicion is not evidence.

 

Jim Tanimoto and a few others tried to complain about the policy of exclusion without due process, without a charge and without a conviction in a court of law.

 

But the government ignored all such protests. According to the government, the war created an emergency. The policy of exclusion was a necessity. There was no time to charge more than 111,000 persons and to try their cases in a court of law.

 

After the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on 7 December 1941, all citizens of Japanese origin were expelled from the armed forces of the US. This was government policy. Even though there was no evidence that any soldier of Japanese origin had been disloyal to the United States.

 

In 1943, when the United States needed as many soldiers as possible, this policy was reversed. Now the government invited Japanese Americans citizens to enlist in the US Army.

 

A questionnaire was presented to all male members of the second generation (nisei) who were US citizens.

 

Two questions caused a problem for some of them: questions 27 and 28.

 

** The former question asked if the person was willing to enlist in the US Army and fight for the US.

 

** The latter question asked if the person was willing to renounce all loyalty to Japan and promise to be loyal only towards the United States.

 

When Jim Tanimoto talks about this event, he says he said no to both questions. He also explains why he did this. It was not because he was loyal to Imperial Japan. It was because he was an American citizen and he felt the US government had no right to ask him such questions. He regarded such questions as an insult.

 

The Japanese Americans who said no to questions 27 and 28 became known as no-no boys.

 

The no-no boys were regarded as troublemakers and as disloyal to the United States. All no-no boys from the other nine camps were transferred to Tule Lake where the administration established a prison within the prison.

 

Jim Tanimoto was not enlisted in the US Army. For a while, he remained in a camp in California. In 1944, he and his family were released. They were allowed to return to their former home in California. But starting over was not easy.

 

Even though they were free, they were met with much suspicion and distrust from the white community. They often faced discrimination. Many white employers and business owners did not want to hire Japanese Americans.

 

Many white people still blamed them for the attack on Pearl Harbor, even though the Japanese Americans had nothing to do with this episode.

 

Eventually, Jim Tanimoto was able to make a good life for himself and his family as a farmer in California. He still lived there when this film was made. Perhaps he is not so active anymore; perhaps he is retired. Since he was born in 1923, he is almost 100 years old by now.

 

The story of the internment of the Japanese Americans during World War Two has been told before, in books and in documentary films.

 

How is this film?

 

In my opinion, it tells the story very well. When one person talks about his own experience, the story becomes very personal.

 

It is not only seen from the outside by the academic experts. It is also seen from the inside by a person who lived through it.

 

This is, in my opinion, an important film about an important topic.

 

I want to go all the way to the top with this product. I think it deserves a rating of five stars (100 percent).

 

REFERENCES

 

# 1. Books

 

Years of Infamy: The Untold Story of America’s Concentration Camps by Michi Weglyn (1976)

 

Keeper of Concentration Camps: Dillion S. Myer and American Racism by Richard Drinnon (1987)

 

By order of the President: FDR and the Internment of Japanese Americans by Greg Robinson (2001)

 

Free to Die for Their Country: The Story of the Japanese American Draft Resisters in World War II by Eric L. Muller (2003)

 

Prisoners Without Trial: Japanese Americans in World War II by Roger Daniels (2004) (2019)

 

American Inquisition: The Hunt for Japanese American Disloyalty in World War II by Eric L. Muller (2007)

 

When Can We Go Back to America? Voices of Japanese American Incarceration during WWII by Susan H. Kamei (2021)

 

# 2. Documentary films

 

Amache: Granada War Relocation Camp

PBS, 58 minutes

19 June 2013

 

A Bitter Legacy

Director: Claudia Katayanagi

Run time: 78 minutes

2016

 

Resistance at Tule Lake

Writer, producer, and director: Konrad Aderer

Run time: 78 minutes

2017

 

A Grave Injustice

PBS, 27 minutes

15 August 2019

 

Hidden Heroes: The Nisei Soldiers of WWII

The History Channel

Run time: 43 minutes

2021

 

Armed With Language

PBS, 57 minutes

17 May 2021

 

Betrayed: 

Surviving an American Concentration Camp

PBS, 57 minutes

8 April 2022

 

Alternative Facts: 

The Lies of Executive Order 9066

PBS, 58 minutes

8 April 2022

 

# 3. Items available on the internet

 

** The Densho Encyclopedia

An online resource about the Japanese American experience during World War II

 

** Japanese American Incarceration During World War II

The National Archives

US Government

 

*****

On this blog

My review of

A Bitter Legacy

(2016)

Posted in March 2020

 

*****

On this blog

My review of

Betrayed:

Surviving an American Concentration Camp

(2022)

And two additional items about the Japanese Americans and the internment during World War Two

Posted in June 2022

 

*****


Mr. Tanimoto's Journey

(PBS, 2018)

 

*****


Jim Tanimoto as a young man

(born 1923)

 

*****


Jim Tanimoto as an old man

(born 1923)


*****



Friday, August 12, 2022

Knoxville's Red Summer: The Riot of 1919 (2019)

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Knoxville’s Red Summer: The Riot of 1919 is a documentary film which premiered on US television (PBS) in 2019.

 

It is an episode of a series called Black in Appalachia.

 

The topic of this film is a violent confrontation between a white mob and African Americans which took place in Knoxville (Tennessee) in August 1919 and which caused death and destruction in the city.

 

This violent confrontation between blacks and whites was one of more than 25 similar episodes which happened in towns and cities across the United States during that year. They are often referred to as the Red Summer of 1919 because of the blood that was spilled during racial conflicts.

 

The term “The Red Summer of 1919” was coined by civil rights activist James Weldon Jackson (1871-1938) who was the executive secretary of the NAACP for ten years (1920-1930).

 

Here is some basic information about this film:

 

** Director: C. Lee Smith

** Production: East Tennessee PBS

** Available on the PBS website

** Language: English

** Subtitles: not available!

** Run time: 27 minutes

 

Three persons are interviewed in the film. Here are the names of the participants:

 

** Robert J. Booker – author and researcher

 

** W. Fitzhugh Brundage – Professor of History - University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

 

** Matthew “Matt” Lakin – journalist – Knoxville News Sentinel

 

The violent confrontations which happened in 25 towns and cities across the United States in 1919 were not organized; they were not coordinated.

 

Each episode had a specific trigger which started the violent confrontation. But once they had started, they were similar in many ways. There was a pattern.

 

(1) Some white people are outraged, because a black person has allegedly committed an offense against white people. It does not matter much if the charge is true or not.

 

(2) A white mob is formed. The white mob begins to attack a black neighborhood and blames black people for what is happening.

 

(3) In many cases, some of the blacks are veterans from World War One who know how to fight. They do not back down. They do not surrender. They fight back. The violence escalates and blacks are blamed for this.

 

(4) Law enforcement (state troops) are often called in to restore peace and order. Law enforcement sides with the white mob and often causes more death and destruction.

 

(5) When peace is finally restored, African Americas are often blamed for what happened. White people are usually not charged with any crimes. If they are, they are usually found not guilty.

 

What was the trigger in Knoxville?

 

How did the confrontation start?

 

During the night of 30 August 1919, a white woman was killed by an intruder who shot her with a gun. Her name was Bertie Lindsay. She was 27 years old. A witness Ora Smyth (who was Bertie’s cousin) says she saw the perpetrator.

 

The police had a suspect: Maurice Mays, a biracial man, a mulatto, who was regarded as a black man. The witness Ora Smyth identified Maurice Mays as the perpetrator. He was arrested and charged with murder.

 

As the word was spreading through the town, a white mob was formed. The white people wanted to take justice into their own hands and kill the suspect. A lynching was being prepared.

 

The sheriff at the jail where Maurice Mays was held knew that something drastic might happen. He decided to move the prisoner first to another jail and then to another town.

 

When the mob arrived at the prison, they could not find Maurice Mays, because he was not there anymore. Furious that they could not do what they wanted, the mob ransacked the place and drank the alcohol that had been confiscated and which was stored in the basement. Having done that, they left the place.

 

From the prison, they walked towards the black neighborhood where they attacked any black person they came across and destroyed as much property as possible.

 

The Tennessee National Guard was called in to restore peace and order. At one point, members of the TNG used two machine guns to fire at the black neighborhood.

 

The number of deaths is not certain. The official number of deaths is two. An unofficial estimate says the number is likely to be around 30.

 

What about Maurice Mays? What happened to him? He escaped the lynching party which came to the prison to kill him, but the charge against him was not forgotten.

 

In 1919, he was tried in a court of law in 1919. He claimed he was innocent. The evidence against him was dubious. The eyewitness identification was not reliable. But this did not help him.

 

A white woman stated that she had been attacked by a black man in a similar way after Maurice Mays had been arrested. Her testimony seemed to support Mays’ claim of innocence. But the judge did not allow her to testify.

 

The jury deliberated for less than one hour and declared him guilty. He was sentenced to die. But because of a technical error the verdict was not allowed to stand.

 

In 1921, he was tried again. This time, the verdict was the same as the first time. He was sentenced to die and this time the verdict was allowed to stand.

 

On 15 march 1922, the death sentence was carried out. He was killed in an electric chair. He was 35 years old.

 

One hundred years later, the case is still being discussed. The 1919 murder of Bertie Lindsay which triggered the Race Riot in Knoxville. The arrest and subsequent trial of Maurice Mays followed by the execution in 1922.

 

Was he guilty or innocent?

 

Was he a victim of a wrongful conviction?

 

These basic questions are discussed in this film about Knoxville’s Red Summer of 1919.

 

Looking back at the case, the answer seems to be obvious, but the official verdict of 1921 still stands.

 

The violent confrontation which happened in Knoxville (Tennessee) in August 1919 is a sad story. It is one of more than 25 similar episodes which happened in towns and cities across the United States during that year.

 

The story deserves to be told, and in this film, it is done very well. If you are interested in the history of the United States – in particular the question of human rights – this film is definitely something for you.

 

It is highly recommended.

 

REFERENCES

 

# 1. Books

 

From Race Riot to Sit-In, 1919 and the 1960s: A Study in the Connections between Conflict and Violence by Arthur I. Waskow (1967)

 

Encyclopedia of American Race Riots edited by Walter C. Rucker and James N. Upton (2 volumes, 930 pages) (2007)

 

On the Laps of Gods: The Red Summer of 1919 and the Struggle for Justice that Remade a Nation by Robert Whitaker (2009)

 

Anatomy of Four Race Riots: Racial Conflict in Knoxville, Elaine (Arkansas), Tulsa, and Chicago, 1919-1921 by Lee E. Williams and Lee E. Williams II (2010)

 

Red Summer: The Summer of 1919 and the Awakening of Black America by Cameron McWhirter (2011)

 

Civilizing Torture: An American Tradition by William Fitzhugh Brundage (2018) (2020)

 

# 2. Items available on the internet

 

Matthew “Matt” Lakin,

“Maurice Franklin Mays: 

Died claiming innocence but conviction stands,”

Knox News Sentinel,

26 February 2012

 

Angela Dennis,

 “Maurice Mays and the Knoxville Race Riots: 

A Tragedy Forgotten,”

Medium

2 February 2019

 

Christina Maxouris,

“100 years ago, white mobs across the country attacked black people. And they fought back,”

CNN News,

27 July 2019

 

Larry Van Guilder,

“A brutal crime and a questionable conviction,”

Knox TN Today,

24 December 2019

 

Shelby Davidson (writer) and Nancy Locklin (editor)

Part one = Bertie Lindsay, Maurice Mays, and the events leading up to the Knoxville Race Riot of 1919

Part two = The Race Riot and the unjust execution of Maurice Mays

The Night Marauder Project,

15 October 2021

 

# 3. Film and video

 

Red Chicago

PBS, 27 minutes

16 March 2020

 

The Red Summer of 1919:

Crash Course Black American History # 25

Available on YouTube

Run time: 13 minutes

13 November 2021

 

*****


Maurice Mays

Executed in 1922


*****


Anatomy of Four Race Riots:

Racial Conflict in Knoxville, 

Elaine (Arkansas), Tulsa,and Chicago, 1919-1921

By Lee E. Williams and Lee E. Williams II

(2010)

 

*****