The ninth edition of Lonely Planet’s guidebook to
I had it
with me on a trip to Egypt during which I was able to check
some of the facts presented in the book. Using my personal experience as a
yardstick, I must say it is, in many ways, a good book, but there are some
flaws which should not be found in the ninth edition of a book. Let me explain.
In some
cases, it seems, the text was not quite up to date at the time of publication. Here is one example:
On page
204 the authors mention the Serapeum in Sakkara . But when I arrived there, it was closed. My
guide told me it was closed for renovation several years ago. If it was closed
in 2005, why is this not mentioned in a book that is published in 2008?
In some
cases, the text is not quite accurate:
(1) On page
188 the authors say “The Illustrated Guide to the Egyptian Museum in Cairo
is written by Zahi Hawass … and published by the excellent American University in Cairo Press.”
This excellent book is not written by Zahi Hawass. It is edited by
Alessandro Bongioanni and Maria Croce Sole. The text is written by the editors
and other Italian scholars. Zahi Hawass has written the preface.
This book has been published by VMB Publishers, an imprint of White Star Books, with a slightly different title:
(2) On page
282 the authors mention a hotel in Luxor : “At the end of 2008 the name of
the hotel will change to Meretem Jolie Ville…” The correct name is Maritim
Jolie Ville.
(3) On page
326 the authors mention a hotel in Abu Simbel : “Seti Abu Simbel … is Abu Simbel ’s only five-star hotel.” In fact,
it is a four-star hotel.
(4) The
authors are not quite sure how to spell the name of the pharaoh who succeeded
Ramses II. On page 190 they call him Merenptah, which I prefer. But when they
mention his temple (page 257) and his tomb (page 261) they call him Merneptah,
which I do not like.
Some cross
references are incorrect, maybe they refer to an older edition of the book, and
the page number was not updated:
(1) On page
191 the authors say “see boxed text p. 261.” But there is no box on page 261.
There is a box on page 260, and there is another one on page 263. But which one
is it?
(2) On page
207 the authors say “see boxed text (210) for more details.” But there is no
box on page 210. The relevant box is found on page 198.
In some
cases, the information given is incomplete:
(1) On page
288 the authors mention the night train from Luxor to Cairo . They say it departs at 8.30 and
9.30 p.m. and the duration is nine hours. But when we took this train, it departed
at 10.30 p.m. and the duration was ten hours. The train does not go to the main
railway station in Cairo (Ramses). It goes to Giza Station
on the west bank. But this fact only emerges in the chapter about Cairo . Giza Station is mentioned in the
text on page 180 and shown on the map on page 110.
(2) On page
516 the authors say you can buy prepaid phone cards from Vodafone. But they do
not explain that in order to use a prepaid card you must first buy an Egyptian
SIM card from Vodafone, which is quite expensive: 150 Egyptian pounds. The
stored value in the SIM card is less than one Egyptian pound, which is just
enough to make a call to refill the account with a prepaid card.
I have to
mention two more things which bother me:
(1) In the
beginning of the book the authors present 15 Egyptian highlights: “The very
best of Egypt .” Number 14 on this list is Petra,
which is located in Jordan! It is OK to mention the ferry that sails between Egypt and Jordan (page 526), but placing Petra on a list of great Egyptian sites is
absurd.
(2) On pp. 293-294
the authors present the temple of Edfu with these words:
“The
temple’s well-preserved reliefs have provided archaeologists with much valuable
information about the temple rituals and the power of the priesthood. Walking
through the large gloomy chambers, visitors are sometimes overwhelmed by a
sense of awe at the mysteries of ancient Egypt .”
This
passage is borrowed - almost word for word - from Kent Weeks, The Treasures of Luxor and the Valley of the Kings, page 540, although the source is not
revealed.
There are two statements here. The first one (about the reliefs) is fine, but the second one (about visitors being overwhelmed) is silly. I do not understand why a scholar such as Kent Weeks would want to say something like that, and I do not understand why anyone would want to copy his statement.
I sent a message to
Lonely Planet to tell them about these flaws, hoping they would not be found in
the next edition. Unfortunately, I was too late!
No comments:
Post a Comment