A Prominent
Patient is a historical and biographical drama (based on a true story) about
the famous Czechoslovakian diplomat and politician Jan Masaryk. Here is some basic
information about this drama which premiered in 2016:
** Director:
Julius Sevcik
** Writers: Julius
Sevcik, Petr Kolecko & Alex Königsmark
** Soundtrack:
Czech, English, French
** Subtitles:
Czech, Slovak – no English subtitles!
** Released on DVD
in 2017
** Run time: 113
minutes
The cast includes
the following:
** Karel Roden as
Jan Masaryk (1886-1948) – a Czechoslovakian diplomat and politician
** Hanns Zischler
as Dr Hugo Stein – a German doctor who lives and works in the US – a fictional
character
** Oldrich Kaiser
as Edward Benes (1884-1948) – President of Czechoslovakia 1935-1938 and
1945-1948
** Arly Jover as
Marcia Davenport (1903-1996) – a US writer – author of a biography about Mozart
** Jiri Vyoralek as Konrad Henlein (1898-1945) –
leader of the Germans in Sudetenland
** Dermot Crowley as Lord Halifax (1881-1959) – UK
Foreign Minister 1938-1940
** Paul Nicholas as Neville Chamberlain (1869-1940) –
UK Prime Minister 1937-1940
Jan Masaryk is the son of Tomas G. Masaryk, Czechoslovakia’s
first president, 1918-1935. Jan followed in his father’s footsteps: he was
Czechoslovakia’s ambassador to the UK 1925-1938 and Czechoslovakia’s Foreign
Minister 1940-1948 (during the war, the Czechoslovakian government was in exile
in London).
Both father and son were popular and respected in
Czechoslovakia. Even today, when the country has been split into two countries,
Jan Masaryk is still an important historical figure in the Czech Republic.
Since this movie is based on a true story, the basic
facts are part of the public record. They are not a secret. Therefore I feel
free to mention some of them in this review.
While this movie is based on a true story, it is not a
documentary film. It is a dramatized version of events. Not everything happened
exactly as shown in this movie, but the basic story is true.
As stated above, this movie is about Jan Masaryk, but
it does not cover his whole life from the beginning to the end. It focuses on a
brief but significant part of his life: the time from 1937 to 1939; i.e. the
two years before the outbreak of World War Two.
During the first year, 1937-1938, he was
Czechoslovakia’s ambassador to the UK. In 1938 he resigned his post in order to
protest the fact that the Czechoslovakian government had handed over the
Sudetenland to Nazi Germany.
In this movie, we follow Jan Masaryk and his increasingly
desperate attempts to preserve his country intact and to avoid a war with
Germany. He appeals to the leaders of the UK and France, but this does not
help. He feels that these two great powers are selling his country - step by
step - to Nazi Germany in order to preserve peace in Europe. As we all know,
peace was not preserved, even though Czechoslovakia was sacrificed.
The drama is set in three different locations: in the
UK (London), in Czechoslovakia (Prague), and in the US (although no scene is
actually filmed in London, and no scene is actually filmed in the US).
What do reviewers say about this historical and
biographical drama? On IMDb it has a rating of 69 per cent, which corresponds
to 3.5 stars on Amazon. If you ask me, this rating is too high. Why?
The topic is highly interesting and the movie is based
on a true story, but it is not great; it is not even good; it is average. It
has some significant flaws. Let me explain:
# 1. The movie-makers have placed Jan Masaryk in a
sanatorium in the US where he is treated by a German psychiatrist who has moved
to the US in order to escape the government of Nazi Germany. Hence the English
title of the drama: A Prominent Patient.
This part of the story is pure fiction; a product of
the director’s and the writer’s vivid imagination. There is no evidence that
Jan Masaryk was in a sanatorium in the US. Dr Hugo Stein, the German doctor who
is treating him, is a fictional character.
While Jan Masaryk is in the US, in 1939, he meets a US
reporter, Marcia Davenport, who mostly writes about music, but she is also
interested in global politics, and they become very close very fast. The US
reporter is a real historical person, but it seems they did not meet each other
until 1941. The movie-makers have changed the chronology of events here.
# 2. The movie covers the time from 1937 to 1939, but
the story does not follow a chronological line from 1937 to the outbreak of
World War Two in September 1939. It seems the director decided that this would
be too easy and too boring. Therefore he decided to take another approach: the
story flips back and forth between the starting point in 1937 and the ending
point in 1939!
Each time the story jumps to a new time and place, an
on-screen message tells us where we are, but it does not help much. The
structure of the movie is chaotic, confusing, and very difficult to follow,
unless you are an expert in this period of European history, so you know
exactly when each meeting and each new development took place.
# 3. Arly Jover, who plays the US reporter Marcia
Davenport, is a Spanish actress (born 1971). Why pick a Spanish actress to play
the role of a US reporter? Was it impossible to find a US actress who had the
right age and the right look?
Dermot Crowley who plays the UK Foreign Minister Lord
Halifax is an Irish actor (born 1947). Why pick an Irish actor to play the role
of an English politician? Was it impossible to find an English actor who had
the right age and the right look?
# 4. In one scene (set in London) we see Jan Masaryk
standing outside a hotel that is called the Mycroft Hotel. As far as I know,
there is no hotel in London with this name. What is the reason for choosing
this name? Perhaps it is a hidden reference to Sherlock Holmes and his brother
Mycroft? If it is, I fail to see the relevance. Jan Masaryk has no connection to
Sherlock Holmes.
On the positive side I must say that there is one
aspect which the movie-makers got right: the language that is spoken in the
movie. When we are in Prague, the dialogue is in Czech. When Jan Masaryk is in
the UK or in the US, the dialogue is in English. The languages spoken are
realistic, but this cannot save the movie, because there are some serious
flaws.
I wanted to like this movie, because the topic is very
interesting and because it is based on a true story, but as you can see, there
are some flaws which cannot be ignored; which cannot be overlooked. I have to
remove two stars because of these flaws. Therefore I think this drama deserves
a rating of three stars.
PS # 1. The death of Jan Masaryk in 1948 is a
controversial event which is not covered in this movie, because it is outside
the time frame chosen (1937-1939). He fell from a window and died. But why did
he fall? Did he jump? Was it a suicide? Or was he pushed? Was it a murder? This
event has been the subject of a long-running debate which is still going on
today, many decades after it happened. For more information, see the following
items which are available online:
** Rob Cameron, “Police close the case on 1948 death
of Jan Masaryk – murder, not suicide,” Radio Praha, 6 January 2004
** Ian Willoughby, “Jan Masaryk’s mysterious death: a
last nail in the coffin,” Radio Praha, 10 March 2018
PS # 2. The following review of the movie is available
online: Jay Weissberg, “Berlin Film Review: A Prominent Patient,” Variety, 17
February 2017.
PS # 3. The Australian television station SBS has a
website “SBS on Demand” where a short version of this movie available until the
end of 2018. This version, which runs for 95 minutes, has English subtitles
when the conversation is not in English. Please note: in order to access this
website, you must be in Australia.
PS # 4. The Devil’s Mistress is the English title of
a Czech historical and biographical drama (based on a true story) about the
life and career of the famous Czechoslovakian actress Lida Baarova, who had a
two-year affair with Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s Minister of Propaganda. This
movie premiered in 2016.
*****
Jan Masaryk (1886-1948)
*****
No comments:
Post a Comment