A Fragile Trust:
Plagiarism, Power, and Jayson Blair at the New York Times is a documentary
film which premiered in 2013. It was shown on US television (“Independent
Lens”) in 2014. Here is some basic information about it:
** Producer and
director: Samantha Grant
** Available on Amazon Video
** Run time: 75 minutes
** Available on Amazon Video
** Run time: 75 minutes
Jayson Blair (born
1976) was a reporter at the New York Times. In 2003 he resigned, after it had
been revealed that at least half of the articles he had written for the paper were
based on fabrications and plagiarism. By resigning, he avoided being fired.
When the editors of the paper wanted to fire him, they discovered that he had
resigned the day before.
This film covers
Jason Blair’s life and career, focusing on his work at the New York Times. The film
discusses how and why he did it. It also discusses why the editors did not stop
him sooner.
With the benefit
of hindsight, we can see that there were several warning signs that something
was seriously wrong with Jayson Blair long before he resigned from the New York
Times in 2003.
In this film, Jayson
Blair gets a chance to explain what happened. He talks a lot, but does not show
much remorse. He says it was stupid, but he does not apologize. He does not
blame himself. He seems to blame the editors of the paper for not stopping him
sooner.
While Jayson Blair
is allowed to talk, this film does not want to defend him. Several other people
are interviewed as well. Some of them were directly involved in the case, while
others were observers. These people have a different approach. Here are their
names in alphabetical order:
** Jerry Gray,
political editor, NYT
** Macarena Hernandez, reporter, San Antonio Express-News
** Howard Kurtz, media critic, Washington Post
** Adam Liptak, correspondent, NYT
** Macarena Hernandez, reporter, San Antonio Express-News
** Howard Kurtz, media critic, Washington Post
** Adam Liptak, correspondent, NYT
** Seth Mnookin,
author of the book “Hard News” (2004, 2005)
** Howell Raines, executive editor, NYT
** Robert Rivard, editor, San Antonio Express-News
** William E. Schmidt, assistant managing editor, NYT
** Howell Raines, executive editor, NYT
** Robert Rivard, editor, San Antonio Express-News
** William E. Schmidt, assistant managing editor, NYT
** Al Siegal,
assistant managing editor, NYT
** Lena Williams, correspondent, NYT
** Edward Wong, correspondent, NYT
** Lena Williams, correspondent, NYT
** Edward Wong, correspondent, NYT
[There is also a brief
clip with Gerald Boyd, managing editor, NYT, but this is archive footage. Boyd
died in 2006. He was no longer alive when Samantha Grant began to make her
film.]
What do reviewers
say about it? Here are the results of three movie aggregators:
** 56 per cent =
Metacritic
** 67 per cent = IMDb
** 67 per cent = Rotten Tomatoes
** 67 per cent = IMDb
** 67 per cent = Rotten Tomatoes
The topic is
important and interesting, but the ratings are not impressive, as you can see.
They correspond to something like three stars on Amazon. If you ask me, these
average ratings are too low.
On the other hand,
I cannot go all the way to the top, because this film has a flaw: it does not
mention a similar case which happened five years before Jason Blair was exposed
as a fraud.
This case concerns
Stephen Glass (born 1972) and The New Republic. In 1998 he was fired, after it
was revealed that several of the articles he had written in this journal and in
other journals were based on fabrications.
Stephen Glass was 26
when the scandal involving him broke. Jayson Blair was 27 when the scandal
involving him broke. These two reporters had almost the same age when they were
exposed. They had been working as fabricators for several years before the
truth about them was finally discovered.
How could they get
away with this for so long? One significant reason is that they working with
words and words alone. They did not have to provide any photos to support their
stories. If they had been asked to provide a few photos it would have been much
more difficult for them to deceive their editors and their readers for such a
long time.
Many people were
interviewed for this film. But not one of them mentions the case of Stephen
Glass and The New Republic which happened only five years before the case of
Jayson Blair and the New York Times. The omission of this case is a serious
flaw which cannot be ignored; which cannot be overlooked.
I like this film
and I want to give it a good rating, but I have remove one star because of this
flaw. Therefore I think it deserves a rating of four stars.
PS # 1. Burning
down My Master’s House: My Life at the New York Times by Jason Blair was
published in 2004 (hardcover) and 2006 (paperback). The book is mentioned in the film. We are told that
it got poor reviews. This is true. On the US version of Amazon there are more
than forty reviews of this book. The average rating is 2.5 stars. More than
twenty reviewers offer only one star!
PS # 2. Hard News:
Twenty-One Brutal Months at the New York Times and how it changed the American
Media by Seth Mnookin was published in 2004 (hardcover) and 2005 (paperback). The author, who appears in the
film, is one of the sharpest critics of Jayson Blair.
PS # 3. Shattered
Glass is a movie about Stephen Glass and his time at The New Republic. It was
released in 2003.
*****
Jayson Blair (born 1976)
*****
No comments:
Post a Comment