Queen of the
Desert is a historical and biographical drama (based on a true story) about the unusual life of Gertrude
Bell. Here is some basic information about it:
** Written and
directed by Werner Herzog
** Premiered in Berlin in 2015
** Shown in theatres in 2016
** Run time: 128 minutes
** Premiered in Berlin in 2015
** Shown in theatres in 2016
** Run time: 128 minutes
The movie is
partially based on the biography by Georgina Howell (1942-2016). The book was
first published in 2006 with the title Daughter of the Desert. Later the
title was changed to Queen of the Desert. In 2015 it was reprinted in order
to coincide with Herzog’s movie. Here is a link to the book: Queen of the Desert.
The cast includes
the following:
** Nicole Kidman
as Gertrude Bell (1868-1926)
** James Franco as Henry Cadogan
** Damian Lewis as Charles “Dick” Doughty-Wylie (1868-1915)
** Robert Pattinson as T. E. Lawrence (1888-1935)
** Christopher Fulford as Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
** Nick Waring as Mark Sykes (1876-1919)
** Jay Abdo as Fattou (Bell’s guide in the Middle East)
** James Franco as Henry Cadogan
** Damian Lewis as Charles “Dick” Doughty-Wylie (1868-1915)
** Robert Pattinson as T. E. Lawrence (1888-1935)
** Christopher Fulford as Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
** Nick Waring as Mark Sykes (1876-1919)
** Jay Abdo as Fattou (Bell’s guide in the Middle East)
I do not wish to
spoil the viewing for anyone. Therefore I am not going to reveal too much about what
happens in this movie. But I have to mention some details in order to
explain my rating. Moreover, all facts mentioned in this review are part of the
public record and therefore they can hardly be described as spoilers.
PART ONE
THE LIFE OF GERTRUDE BELL
THE LIFE OF GERTRUDE BELL
In this film we follow
the unusual life of Gertrude Bell for almost three decades, from 1894, when she
was 26, to 1921, five years before her death. But the film does not follow a
chronological line. The opening scene is set in 1914. After this scene we are
taken back to 1894. From here the story moves slowly forward to World
War One (1914-1918) and to the Cairo Conference of 1921.
Gertrude is born
into a rich family in England. She never has any economic problems. She is
independent. She studies history at Oxford University. She does not want to look
for a suitable husband and sit at home while he goes out into the world. This is the time when Victoria is queen of England, but Gertrude does not want to
do what is expected of a wealthy woman in Victorian times.
In 1892, she travels to Tehran, the capital of Persia or Iran. Here she
learns how to read Farsi, the language of Persia or Iran. Her teacher is Henry
Cadogan, third secretary at the British Embassy in Tehran. After a while she
falls in love with him, and he with her, but this relationship is doomed: her
father will not permit her to marry him, because he is considered unsuitable:
he is a gambler. In spite of her independence, she obeys him, and their romance
is going nowhere. A few months after she leaves Persia, Henry dies from
pneumonia (1893).
To forget her
sorrow, Gertrude travels the deserts of Arabia which are at the time a part of
the Ottoman Empire. She meets with the tribes of the desert and becomes an
expert on the Arab world. During her journeys she meets T. E. Lawrence, aka Lawrence of Arabia, and Mark Sykes, who is associated with the
Sykes-Picot Agreement about partitioning the Ottoman Empire.
While travelling in
the Middle East, Gertrude also meets the British officer Charles “Dick”
Doughty-Wylie who is stationed there. After a while she falls in love with him,
and he with her, but this relationship is also doomed: he is already married,
and his wife says she will kill herself if he leaves her. Gertrude says she will kill herself if he does not leave his wife. Unable to solve this
dilemma, he joins the ill-fated Gallipoli campaign which begins on 25 April 1915. He is
killed in action the very next day.
In 1918, when World War One ends, the Ottoman Empire is falling apart. Winston Churchill
comes to Cairo in 1921 where he presides over the Cairo Conference whose
objective is to reorganise the Middle East.
Among the
participants are Lawrence of Arabia and Gertrude Bell. An on-screen message placed at
the end of the movie explains that Gertrude works with Churchill when he wants
to create the new state of Iraq and delineate its borders.
Gertrude moves to
Bagdad where she works with the new government. She also establishes the
National Archaeological Museum. She dies in Bagdad in 1926.
Werner Herzog is
an experienced movie-maker. If we look at the cinematography, I must say it is a
beautiful movie with wonderful images of the Arabian deserts. Because of
current conflicts in the Middle East, it was impossible to shoot the movie in
the correct locations. Instead it was shot in Morocco.
However, this
movie is not only about beautiful pictures of the desert. It is also the
biography of an unusual person who spent a large part of her life in the Middle
East. Does it work as a biography? If you ask me, the answer is no. It
has several flaws: some of them concern specific points in the movie, while
others are more general. Let me explain:
PART TWO
SPECIFIC POINTS
SPECIFIC POINTS
# 1. The first
scene is set in Cairo in 1914. An on-screen message tells us this is a
meeting in the Arab Bureau. Among the participants we see Lawrence of Arabia,
Mark Sykes, and Winston Churchill. However, the Arab Bureau was not created
until January 1916, so how could there be a meeting in this forum in 1914? The
very first scene is based on a false chronology.
# 2. During the
meeting in the Arab Bureau, Churchill asks the others: who knows the land? Who
knows the leaders? Richard says: “Gertrude.” And Churchill responds: “Gertrude
who?” Lawrence of Arabia says: “Bell.” But this entire dialogue is hopeless.
Churchill knew all about Gertrude Bell and her travels in the Middle East. How? Because Gertrude and his wife Clementine were cousins. The
real Churchill would never have asked such questions.
# 3. When
Gertrude’s name is mentioned, Mark Sykes says a long line of negative words to
describe her. The quote is accurate, but he did not say it in this forum. He
wrote these words in a private letter to his wife. Werner Herzog took these
words from the letter and transferred them to a completely different forum. As
you can see, there are many problems connected with this scene, which is the
opening scene in the movie.
# 4. The second
scene is placed in England in 1894. Gertrude is getting ready for a ball she
does not want to attend. A women talks to her, and Gertrude says: “Yes,
mother.” This response is odd, because Gertrude’s mother died in
1871, when Gertrude was only three years old. Who is the woman? The woman is Gertrude's step-mother, Lady Florence Bell, but this fact is not revealed in the drama.
# 5. When Gertrude
comes to Tehran, Henry Cadogan teaches her to read Farsi. At one point they
are reading a Farsi inscription together. As they read, they move a finger
across the text. The finger moves from left to right. This is most unfortunate,
because Farsi is written from right to left. The finger is moving the wrong
way. Werner Herzog has changed the way Farsi is written. This is quite an
accomplishment!
PART THREE
GENERAL POINTS
GENERAL POINTS
# 1. When Gertrud
travels in the deserts of Arabia, the local people talk to her in Arabic and
she responds in Arabic. How, when and where did she learn to speak Arabic? We
did not see anything about this. All of a sudden she can speak Arabic! I know she could. My point is this: why does Herzog not show us how this
happened, in the same way as he shows us how she learned to read Farsi?
# 2. In the beginning of the movie,
the local people speak Arabic and Gertrude responds in Arabic. The
conversations are covered with English subtitles. But later, things change: now, the Bedouins of the desert speak English and she speaks English to
them. This is like magic! The Bedouins of the Arabian deserts can speak perfect
English!
I think I know why: Herzog is afraid of using too many subtitles. When he has done
a few scenes with conversation in Arabic, he feels he has
done enough, and from this point all conversations are in English.
When he does this,
he undermines the credibility and authenticity of his movie. He went all the
way to Morocco to shoot the film under realistic conditions. But he does not
want to have too much conversation in Arabic, even though we are in the desert.
Let them speak English. This is easier for the audience.
# 3. Some actors
are miscast. Robert Pattinson does not look like Lawrence of Arabia. Christopher Fulford does not look like Winston Churchill. Pattinson is always wearing an
Arab scarf on his head. This is how he is identified in the movie. When we see
Fulford, the others address him as Churchill, so we can understand who he is.
Otherwise we would never know that these actors are trying to play Lawrence of
Arabia and Winston Churchill.
The leading
actress is Nicole Kidman: an Australian actress who plays a women from England.
Why not pick an actress from England? Perhaps the answer is that Nicole Kidman
is famous and it is more important to have a famous star than to find an
actress who has the right accent.
4. The story of an
unusual women and her long journeys in the Middle East is reduced to two
romances which both failed: the first with Henry Cadogan and the second with
Charles “Richard” Doughty-Wylie. We are told she travelled so much in the
deserts of Arabia that she came to understand the people who lived there. But
what exactly was it that she understood? We do not really find out in this
movie. This is because the director decided to focus on the romances instead of
her journeys.
# 5. During World War One, the British military realises that Gertrude knows a lot about
the Arab people, so they ask her to spy for them. She refuses to do this. She
insists that she does not work for any government. She only travels to study
the land and the people and to satisfy her own curiosity. But later we find out
that she is in fact working for and with the British military. How and why did
she change her mind about this matter? We never learn anything about it.
# 6. When we get
to the Cairo Conference of 1921 at the end of the movie, we find out that she
works with Winston Churchill when he wants to establish the new state of Iraq
and delineate its borders. I assume we are expected to be impressed with
Gertrude because she is an influential person who creates a new state. However,
there is no reason to be impressed. There is nothing to be proud of here. The
new state was and still is a failure, because it included many different ethnic
and religious groups that did not (and do not) respect each other.
If Gertrude knew
so much about the people of the Middle East, how could she advocate the
establishment of the new Iraq with the borders that it has? With the benefit of
hindsight we can see that this state was a hopeless construction from the
beginning. No wonder there have been so many conflicts within this state. No
wonder this state has had so many problems with its neighbours.
Gertrude was an
independent woman who refused to follow Victorian expectations about what a
woman could and should do. But her independence had its limits. She was still a product of her own time: when women in England and the US demanded the female
vote, Gertrude was strongly against it. This fact is not mentioned in the
movie.
When the Ottoman Empire broke up, she felt the Arab people should be ruled by Arab kings. This was the right way to go. She did not make any call for democracy in the Arab world. This issue is not explored in the movie.
When the Ottoman Empire broke up, she felt the Arab people should be ruled by Arab kings. This was the right way to go. She did not make any call for democracy in the Arab world. This issue is not explored in the movie.
CONCLUSION
As stated above,
this is a beautiful movie, but the beautiful images of the Arabian deserts
cannot save the movie. The critical reception was mostly negative. Many
critics did not like it. I am not surprised.
On IMDb it has a rating of 61 per cent, which corresponds to three stars on Amazon; on Meta it has a rating of 38 per cent, which corresponds to two stars on Amazon; and on Rotten Tomatoes it has a rating of only 10 per cent, which corresponds to less than one star on Amazon.
On IMDb it has a rating of 61 per cent, which corresponds to three stars on Amazon; on Meta it has a rating of 38 per cent, which corresponds to two stars on Amazon; and on Rotten Tomatoes it has a rating of only 10 per cent, which corresponds to less than one star on Amazon.
In my opinion, the first rating (IMDb) is too generous. On the other hand, the third rating (Rotten Tomatoes) is too harsh. I will settle for the average (Meta). Queen of the Desert is fundamentally flawed and therefore I cannot
give it more than two stars.
PS # 1. Letters from Baghdad is a documentary film from 2016 about the unusual life of Gertrude Bell.
PS # 2. For more information about the establishment of Iraq, see the following books:
PS # 2. For more information about the establishment of Iraq, see the following books:
** Winston’s Folly:
How Winston Churchill Created Modern Iraq by Christopher Catherwood (2004,
2005)
** When God Made
Hell: The British Invasion of Mesopotamia and the Creation of Iraq, 1914-1921
by Charles Townsend (2010, 2011)
*****
Gertrude Bell (1868-1926)
*****
No comments:
Post a Comment