Monday, October 30, 2023

Dangerous Remedy (2012)

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dangerous Remedy is a historical drama which premiered on Australian television (ABC) in 2012.

 

This drama, which is based on a true story, takes place in Melbourne in the state of Victoria. The time frame seems to be 1969-1972.

 

The main character is the Scottish-born doctor Bertram Wainer who is the front man of a campaign for reform of the abortion law in the state of Victoria.

 

Here is some basic information about this drama:

 

** Producer: Ned Lander

** Director: Ken Cameron

** Writer: Kris Wyld

** Inspired by the book It isn’t nice by Bertram Wainer (published in 1972)

** Language: English

** Subtitles: English

** Run time: 105 minutes

 

The cast includes the following:

 

** Jeremy Sims as Bertram Wainer (1928-1987) – a medical doctor who campaigns for reform of the abortion law in the state of Victoria

 

** Susie Porter as Margaret (Peggy) Berman (1923-2002) – a receptionist in a medical clinic – for a while she is the mistress of Jack Ralph Ford – later she becomes an activist for women’s rights

 

** William McInnes as Jack Ralph Ford – a police inspector – later he becomes head of the homicide department

 

** Maeve Dermody as Joanne (Jo) Richardson – an activist for women’s rights – in 1972 she becomes the second wife of Bertram Wainer

 

** Mark Leonard Winter as Lionel Pugh – an investigative reporter

 

** Gary Sweet as John Edward Matthews – police detective superintendent – he is Ford’s boss

 

** Caroline Craig as Barbara Joyce Wainer (1933-2011) – Bertram’s first wife – they are married in 1954 – they separate in 1962 – they divorce in 1972

 

** Peter O’Brian as Barry Smith – he runs an illegal abortion clinic

 

Since this drama is based on a true story, the basic facts are part of the public record. They are not a secret. This is why I feel free to mention some of them here.

 

While this drama is based on a true story, it is not a documentary film. It is a dramatized version of events. Not everything happened exactly as shown here.

 

Some details may have been added, altered or excluded for dramatic reasons or for practical purposes. But the basic story is true.

 

Bertram Wainer was born in Edinburgh (Scotland) in 1928. In 1949, he immigrated to Australia with his family. In 1954, he married Barbara. The couple had four children: Dirk, Rory, Felice, and Sean.

 

In 1958, he completed his education as a medical doctor. From 1960 to 1966, he worked as an army doctor, but in 1966, he decided to leave the military and become a civilian.

 

He established a general practice in Melbourne in the state of Victoria.

 

One day, a young woman came to his clinic. She had been pregnant, but she did not want the child. At that time, abortion was illegal in the state of Victoria. This is why she went to an illegal clinic in a backyard.

 

An abortion was performed, but something went wrong and she started bleeding. She was afraid. She came to Dr Wainer, hoping that he could help her. He did his best, but the damage was too severe. He could not save her. She died in his clinic.

 

This tragic episode made a big impression on Wainer. A young woman had lost her life, because she felt she had to use an illegal abortion clinic which was not safe.

 

Wainer believed that abortion should be a matter between the pregnant woman and her physician. It should not be a matter for politicians and police officers.

 

Inspired by this tragic episode, he began a campaign for reform of the abortion law in the state of Victoria. It was almost a one-man crusade.

 

When he began his campaign, he found a few allies who agreed with him.

 

At the same time, he made many enemies, who believed abortion was a sin which should be illegal. They declared that any doctor who performed an abortion should be struck off and lose his license to practice medicine.

 

While he was investigating this topic and the legal ramifications, he accidentally stumbled on something which was unexpected: he found evidence of police corruption related to abortion.

 

Apparently, a small group of police officers in Melbourne had created a secret network which included several doctors who were allowed to perform abortions.

 

The police officers made sure the doctors in this network were not investigated. Their clinics were not raided by the police.

 

In return, the doctors paid large sums of money to the police officers who protected them.

 

Police officers are supposed to enforce and uphold the law, but these officers were breaking the law, and they were making money while they were doing this.

 

They were, in effect, running an illegal and secret protection racket and they were making huge profits while they were doing this.

 

Wainer was outraged when he found evidence of this protection racket. While he believed women should have access to abortion, he was shocked to discover that police officers had turned abortion into a profitable business.

 

His friends tried to warn him.

 

They said:

 

If you go any further with this, you will be in trouble!

 

If you try to collect evidence of police corruption, you are placing yourself and the people close to you in great danger!

 

He said he understood, adding that he had to do it. He could not let it go. Over the following months, he and his allies tried to collect solid evidence of the protection racket.

 

The police officers who were involved quickly realised what was going on. They were not happy to see that somebody was trying to expose their secret business operations.

 

At first, they tried to scare him off. When this did not work, they decided to use tougher methods.

 

They tried to kill him in several ways. (1) They tampered with the brakes on his car. (2) Shots were fired at him. (3) He was stabbed with a knife and left for dead, but he was found and rescued.

 

His family was also targeted. He had separated from his wife before the campaign began. But the house where his wife lived with their children was set on fire. Miraculously, they all survived.

 

Wainer did not scare easily. The harsh attacks on him and the people close to him only convinced him that he was on the right track.

 

He was more determined than ever to expose the secret protection racket and he continued his campaign to reform the abortion law in the state of Victoria.

 

Once he had collected solid evidence to prove his case, he faced a new problem. Where was he going to take this evidence? To who could he give it?

 

Even the top brass of the Melbourne police force was opposed to his project. Perhaps they were not involved in any dirty business, but they had on many occasions insisted that the police force was clean.

 

If Wainer had solid evidence which proved that the force was corrupt, this would reflect badly on them.

 

They should have been the first ones to discover any element of corruption and get rid of it. But they had not done this.

 

The police force was corrupt, but they had not done anything about it. Perhaps they did not know? Perhaps they did not care?

 

After searching for a while, Wainer found the proper person to receive his evidence. In addition, he handed copies of his evidence to several media outlets.

 

He assumed that when politicians and media had the relevant information, it would be hard for the police force to deny any wrongdoing.

 

A public inquiry was held under the chairmanship of a barrister, William Kaye.

 

The inquiry confirmed the existence of an illegal and secret protection racket.

 

According to the inquiry, this protection racket had operated for 17 years!

 

Following the inquiry, four police officers were charged. Three of them were found guilty and sent to jail.

 

Three convictions

** John Edward Matthews = five years

** Jack Ralph Ford = five years

** Martin Robert Jacobson = three years

One acquittal

** Frederick John Adam

 

This film covers Bertram Wainer’s life and the consequences of his campaign to reform the law of abortion in the state of Victoria (1969-1972).

 

His efforts had a significant impact on the law of abortion as well as the interpretation of the law.

 

Following his campaign, women had better and easier access to abortion. In 2008, abortion on demand was legalized in the state of Victoria.

 

What do reviewers say about this drama?

 

On IMDb it has a rating of 66 percent. There are four user reviews. Here are the headlines and the ratings offered:

 

30 percent

Disappointing

 

60 percent

Hard viewing

 

70 percent

Gripping story let down by a clunky script

 

90 percent

Gripping and inspirational

 

The average rating of these four reviews is 63 percent, which is slightly below the rating on the website.

 

On Amazon there are at the moment 12 ratings, 11 with reviews.

 

The average rating is 2.7 stars, which corresponds to a rating of 54 percent. Here are the details:

 

5 stars = 19 percent

4 stars = 23 percent

3 stars = no rating

2 stars = 27 percent

1 star = 32 percent

 

As you can see, the ratings are mixed in both cases. Some reviews are positive. They offer good a good rating. But other reviews are negative. They offer a low rating.

 

I understand the positive reviews and I agree with them. I cannot agree with the negative reviews.

 

The story of Bertram Wainer and his campaign for reform of the abortion law is important and deserves to be told. In this drama, it is done very well.

 

I want to go all the way to the top with this product. I think it deserves a rating of five stars (100 percent).

 

REFERENCES

 

# 1. Items available online

 

“The myth of a clean police force.”

The Age, 12 June 2004

 

Neil McMahon,

“Voyage around my father,”

The Age, 4 November 2012

 

[This article is a long interview with Felice Wainer, daughter of Bertram Wainer]

 

“Bertram Barney Wainer (1928-1987)”

By Richard Evans

Australian Dictionary of Biography

2012

 

# 2. Books

 

It isn’t nice

By Bertram Wainer

1972

 

Why isn’t she dead?

By Peggy Berman

With Kevin Childs

1972

 

Lost: illegal abortion stories

By Joanne Wainer

2006

 

# 3. Film and video

 

Abortion, Corruption and Cops –

The Bertram Wainer Story

** Writer and director = John Moore

** Narrator = Angie Milliken

** Run time = 52 minutes

2005

 

How abortion was decriminalized in Australia

The Context – ABC News (4 minutes)

Available on YouTube

 

Could abortion be made illegal in Australia?

The Context – ABC News (29 minutes)

Available on YouTube

 

*****


Abortion, Corruption & Cops:

The Bertram Weiner Story

(2005)

 

*****


The Scottish-born doctor

Bertram Wainer

(1928-1987)

 

*****

 

 

Sunday, October 29, 2023

Mabo (2012)

 


 

 

 

 








Mabo is a historical and biographical drama which premiered at the Sydney Film Festival in 2012.

 

The main character is Eddie Mabo, an aboriginal man, a human rights activist who campaigned for land rights of aboriginal people.

 

The main focus is on the legal battle which Eddie Mabo and his lawyers conducted against the Australian government and against the doctrine known as terra nullius.

 

When the British came to Australia, they declared this territory was nobody's land (terra nullius). This is why they felt they had the right to take whatever they wanted.

 

Obviously, this was not true. But this legal fiction was used to push the indigenous population away and give the land to the British immigrants.

 

Here is some basic information about this drama

 

** Director: Rachel Perkins

** Writer: Sue Smith

** Producers: Darren Dale and Miranda Dear

** Production: Black Fella Films and ABC

** Language: mostly English

** Subtitles: English

** Run time: 103 minutes

 

The cast includes the following:

 

** Jimi Bani as Edward (Eddie) Koiki Mabo (1936-1992) – an aboriginal man - a human rights activist

** Deborah Mailman as Bonita Mabo (1943-2018) – an aboriginal woman – the wife of Eddie Mabo – a human rights activist

** Ewen Leslie as Bryan Keon-Cohen – a barrister

** Felix Williamson as Ron Castan (1939-1999) – a barrister

** Tom Budge as Greg McIntyre – a barrister

** Matthew Whittet as Noel Loos – a historian – author of several books which focus on the indigenous population of Australia

** Leon Ford as Henry Reynolds (born 1938) – a historian – author of several books about the indigenous population of Australia

** Rob Carlton as Patrick “Paddy” Killoran (1922-2010) – an Australian government worker

 

Since this drama is based on a true story, the basic facts are part pf the public record. They are not a secret. This is why I feel free to mention some of them here.

 

While this drama is based on a true story, it is not a documentary film. It is a dramatized version of events. Not everything happened exactly as shown here.

 

Some details have been added or altered or excluded for dramatic reasons or for practical purposes. But the basic story is true.

 

This drama covers the life of Eddie Mabo from the time when he was a boy (aged 10) and a young man (aged 16) until the end of his life in 1992.

 

** We see him with his family – his wife Bonita and their children – Eddie and Bonita were married in 1959 – the couple had seven children – in addition, they adopted three children

 

** We see him with some of his friends – including two historians who are interested in aboriginal affairs: Noel Loos and Henry Reynolds – Eddie met them in 1973, while he was working as a gardener at James Cook University in Queensland

 

** We see him with the barristers who presented his case in several courts: Bryan Keon-Cohen, Ron Castan, and Greg McIntyre

 

** We also see his nemesis – Patrick “Paddy” Killoran, a government official who was supposed to be the protector of the aboriginals

 

Eddie Mabo is often described as a hero, because he was the man behind the legal case which ended the doctrine of terra nullius.

 

When Rachel Perkins from Black Fella Films was talking with representatives of ABC about how to make this movie, it was decided that it was not going to a portrait of a saint.

 

It was going to be an honest portrait of a man who played an important role in the history of modern Australia; not an idealized character, but a real human being who had flaws.

 

This is what she did. This is what we get. In this drama, we can see that Eddie is dedicated to his goal. We can see he is passionate about his ideas. We can also see he is not perfect.

 

Since he is so busy with his legal campaign, he tends to neglect his family. His wife and his children do not see as much of him as they want.

 

He is so focused on his struggle to obtain justice for his people that there is not much time to take care of his own family. There is even a moment when violence against his wife is in the air.

 

Bonita responds immediately: she collects the children and disappears for a while.

 

Before long, Eddie understands that he has crossed a fatal line here and he shows up at the place where she is staying, begging for forgiveness.

 

Bonita accepts his apology and apparently, nothing like this never happens again.

 

The case against the terra nullius doctrine begins in 1982. It is considered in several courts over several years.

 

It is an uphill battle to challenge the state and the federal government. It seems to be an endless battle.

 

But in June 1992, after a legal battle of ten years, the High Court of Australia is finally ready to announce its verdict:

 

Aboriginal people have a case when they say that they should have the right to own the land on which they live. The legal fiction of terra nullius is finally abandoned.

 

Sadly, Eddie Mabo did not live long enough to hear this result. He died in January 1992, five months before the final verdict was issued.

 

But he was the original plaintiff and his name is attached to the case, even though he was no longer alive when the verdict was issued.

 

What do reviewers say about this drama?

 

On IMDb it has a rating of 70 percent.

 

There are five user reviews on the website. Here are the headlines and the ratings offered

 

40 percent

Disappointing

 

60 percent

Pleasant film celebrates a landmark human rights change

 

90 percent

Lovely little TV film … just a pity change is still slow coming in Australia

 

90 percent

Excellent

 

100 percent

Mabo Redeems the Australian Film Industry

 

The average rating of the five reviews is 76 percent, which is slightly higher than the rating offered on the website

 

I understand the positive reviews and I agree with them. I cannot understand the two reviews which offer only 40 or 60 percent.

 

I want to go all the way to the top with this product. I think it deserves a rating of five stars (100 percent).

 

REFERENCES

 

# 1. Items available online

 

Sarah Joseph,

“Reflections on Mabo, the case and the movie.”

The Conversation,

11 June 2012

 

David Ogilvy,

“From the pitch to the screen: Mabo,”

ABC News,

26 June 2012

 

Colleen Keane,

“The story of Mabo,”

The Sydney Morning Herald,

31 January 2014

 

Susan Bye,

“Mabo’s story a great Australian take of justice,”

The Herald Sun,

2 September 2014

 

# 2. Books

 

Dispossession:

Black Australians and White Invaders

By Henry Reynolds

1996

 

Edward Koiki Mabo:

His Life and Struggle for Land Rights

By Noel Loos and Eddie Koiki Mabo

1996

 

Forgotten War

By Henry Reynolds

2013

 

In the Shadow of Holocausts:

Australia and the Third Reich

By Noel Loos

2017

 

# 3. Film and video

 

Rabbit-Proof Fence

A historical drama set in the 1930s

Director: Phillip Noyce

2002

 

The First Australians

A documentary film (seven episodes)

Director: Rachel Perkins

2008

 

Servant or Slave?

Director: Steven McGregor

2016

 

The Australian Wars

A documentary film (three episodes)

Director: Rachel Perkins

2022

 

*****

 

Edward (Eddie) Koiki Mabo

(1936-1992)

An aboriginal man

A human rights activist


*****