Thursday, April 3, 2025

Soundtrack to a Coup d’état (2024)

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Soundtrack to a Coup d’état is a documentary film which premiered in 2024.

 

It is about a series of significant events which happened in Congo in and around the year 1960.

 

Here is some basic information about this film:

 

** Director = Johan Grimonprez

** Writers = Johan Grimonprez and Daan Milius

** Producers = Daan Milius and Rémy Grelleti

** Run time = 150 minutes

 

This is a most unusual film.

 

An account of historical events in the second half of the twentieth century is mixed with numerous clips of jazz music and statements by jazz musicians.

 

It is about one episode in one country: Congo. But it is much more than that.

 

It is also the history of the decolonization of a continent, Africa, as well as the history of the Cold War between East and West, between the Soviet Union and the US.

 

How and why is jazz music relevant in a history of the Cold War?

 

Here is the answer.

 

1960 was the year of decolonization. In or around that year many African colonies became independent states with membership in the United Nations.

 

Both superpowers - the US and the USSR - appealed to the governments of these new states. The US did not want to see them as allies of the USSR. The USSR did not want to see them as allies of the US.

 

The Soviet leaders talked about decolonization and independence, while the American leaders talked about freedom and democracy.

 

The American leaders were afraid that officials from the US State Department would not be able to convince the African politicians to side with the US in the conflict between East and West.

 

They needed a way to charm the African politicians. They asked themselves: What kind of tool do we have? What can we do to achieve this result? And then they found the answer:

 

Jazz is extremely popular all over the world. Jazz is an American product. We will appoint some famous African American jazz musicians as American ambassadors!

 

African American Jazz musicians can sell the American way of life to the African politicians and the African people much better than officials from the State Department!

 

Who were chosen? Who were hired to join the campaign for the US? Here are some names:

 

** Louis Armstrong

** Art Blakely

** John Coltrane

** Miles Davis

** Duke Ellington

** Ella Fitzgerald

** Max Roach

** Nina Simone

 

According to the official version, these musicians toured the African continent to show the governments and the peoples of Africa just how great a country the US is.

 

But in reality, the African American jazz musicians were merely a smokescreen whose purpose was to hide the real purpose of this campaign.

 

The US wanted access to these countries. The US wanted to collect intelligence from these countries.

 

When Louis Armstrong was in Congo in 1960, he was not travelling alone. He was accompanied by officials who were working for the State Department and the CIA.

 

Since they were travelling with Louis Armstrong and his band, they had a plausible excuse to visit many different locations.

 

While Armstrong was doing his tour and playing his popular jazz music, American agents were secretly organising and preparing a coup against Patrice Lumumba, the first democratically elected prime minister of Congo.

 

Lumumba was very popular among ordinary people in his own country Congo and, to a certain degree, also in other African countries.

 

The leaders of the US, the UK, and the former colonial power Belgium were horrified when they learned what Lumumba wanted to do:

 

** He wanted to serve the people

** He wanted real independence

** He wanted the people of Congo to benefit from the natural resources of Congo

 

The leaders of the US, the UK, and the former colonial power Belgium regarded him as a serious threat which had to be eliminated.

 

Lumumba had to be removed from office and, just to be on the safe side, he might as well be killed, so he would be completely out of the picture.

 

In 1961, when Armstrong returned to the US and he learned that Lumumba had been killed in Congo, he was furious.

 

He realised that the US had used him and his colleagues to implement a nefarious policy whose purpose was to maintain control of the former colony even after its independence.

 

The US, the UK, and Belgium wanted to make sure that the independence was only in name but not real.

 

The US, the UK, and Belgium wanted to make sure that the natural resources of Congo would still be available to them without any restrictions.

 

This story is told by director Johan Grimonprez in his film about the history of Congo in and around the year 1960.

 

This is why this film alternates between historical events and clips with jazz music and statements by jazz musicians all the way from the beginning to the end.

 

Does it work? Is the unusual structure of the film a good or a bad idea? Is it an asset or a liability?

 

What do reviewers say about it?

Here are some answers:

 

77 percent = IMDb

91 percent = Meta

97 percent = Rotten Tomatoes

 

In this case, the professional critics and the general audience of Rotten Tomatoes offer the same rating.

 

I understand the numerous positive reviews and I agree with them. The topic is important. The story deserves to be told, and in this film, it is done very well.

 

I want to go all the way to the top with this product. I think it deserves a rating of five stars (100 percent).

 

REFERENCES

 

# 1. Items available online

 

Jason Burke

“Louis Armstrong and the spy: how the CIA used him as a Trojan Horse in Congo,”

The Guardian

12 September 2021

 

Ludo De Witte

“Myth Busting: Dag Hammarskjöld, Katanga, and the Coup against the Lumumba Government,”

Review of African Political Economy

08 February 2024

 

Wendy Ide

“Superb study of how jazz got caught between the Cold War and the CIA,”

The Guardian

16 November 2024

 

Rebecca Cushway

“Louis Armstrong was sent to the Congo to promote US values. His concert was used as a smokescreen for a coup,”

ABC News

21 September 2024

 

Maïthé Chini

“How jazz played out over Congo’s chaotic coup,”

The Brussels Times Magazine

23 January 2025

 

# 2. Books

 

Who Killed Hammarskjöld? The UN, the Cold War, and White Supremacy in Africa

By Susan Williams

(2011)

 

Death in the Congo:

Murdering Patrice Lumumba

By Emmanuel Gerard and Bruce Kuklick

(2015)

 

White Malice:

The CIA and the Covert Recolonization of Africa

By Susan Williams

(2021)

 

The Assassination of Lumumba

By Ludo De Witte

(2022)

 

The Lumumba Plot: The Secret History of the CIA and a Cold War Assassination

By Stuart A. Reid

(2023)

 

# 3. Film and video

 

Lumumba

A historical drama

Run time = 120 minutes

(2000)

 

Hammarskjöld

A historical drama

Run time = 114 minutes

(2023)

 

*****

 

The African politician

Patrice Lumumba

(1925-1961)

Prime Minister of Congo 1960

 

*****


The Assassination of Lumumba

by Ludo De Witte

(2022)

 

*****

 

 

Wednesday, April 2, 2025

Die Akte Oppenheimer (2022)

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Die Akte Oppenheimer is a documentary film which premiered on German television (ARD and ZDF) in 2022. It is a miniseries with five episodes.

 

The topic of this film is the life and times of the German Jew Joseph Süss Oppenheimer, who worked as a banker and a financial advisor for Karl Alexander, the Duke of Württemberg, from 1733 to 1737. During those years, Oppenheimer made many enemies who were jealous of his successful life.

 

In March 1737, when Karl Alexander suddenly died, his enemies conspired to take Oppenheimer down.

 

He was arrested and accused of several serious crimes. He was tried in a court of law where he was found guilty and sentenced to death. He was hanged in February 1738.

 

Here is some basic information about this film

 

** Writer and director Ina Knobloch

** Language: German

** Subtitles: German

** Run time: 5 x 29 minutes = 145 minutes

** The series is available on the websites of ARD and ZDF until April 2027

 

Here are the headlines of the five episodes:

 

# 1. Ursprung = General background

# 2. Herkunft = Personal background

# 3. Entwicklung = Development

# 4.Vernichtung = Destruction

# 5. Verarbeitung = Processing

 

In this film, Director Ina Knobloch covers the life and times of Joseph Süss Oppenheimer in great detail.

 

In the first episode, she covers the general background: the history of Jews in Württemberg and other German states since 1300 and 1400.

 

In the second episode, she explores the early history of Joseph Oppenheimer:

 

** When was he born?

** Where was he born?

 

We do not know when he was born. Perhaps in 1697 or 1698 or 1699? Many observers prefer the year 1698. We do not know where he was born. Perhaps in Heidelberg. Many observers accept this suggestion.

 

In order to have a solid foundation for her account, Ina Knobloch visits several locations in Germany where she can find some relevant information.

 

She visits the state archives in Stuttgart where the documents related to the trial of Oppenheimer held in 1737-1738 are stored.

 

She visits the Jewish Museum in Stuttgart where she interviews the director of the museum. She also visits other museums. In each case, she interviews a person who can provide some relevant information.

 

A long interview with the American historian Yair Mintzker is conducted online. She is in Germany, while he is in the US.

 

Mintzker’s book about the trial of Joseph Oppenheimer was published in 2017.

 

In the third episode, director Ina Knobloch explains how Oppenheimer came to work as a banker and a financial advisor for Karl Alexander, the Duke of Württemberg.

 

This was the high point of Oppenheimer’s career as a businessman. He was making more money than most other people around him and he was granted privileges which were normally not available to a Jewish person.

 

Jews were told to live in the Jewish ghetto, but since Oppenheimer was the right-hand man of the Duke, he was allowed to buy a house near the Duke’s palace and live there.

 

Members of the local elite were jealous of his success. They were furious, because a Jewish person was so successful.

 

Jews were regarded as second-class citizens. They were not supposed to have a life and a career as Oppenheimer had, but his enemies were unable to do anything about it, as long as he was protected by the Duke.

 

In the fourth episode, Ina Knobloch explains how Oppenheimer’s career ended in 1737 and how his life ended in 1738.

 

When the Duke died in March 1737, Oppenheimer’s enemies conspired to take him down. They did not waste any time. They went into action at once.

 

Oppenheimer was arrested and accused of several serious crimes. The charges were fraud, embezzlement, treason, accepting bribes, as well as sexual relations with several women.

 

The case against Oppenheimer lasted eleven months. The charges were serious, but no real evidence was presented to support these charges.

 

After eleven months, when the case came to an end, the court declared him guilty. He was sentenced to death. He was hanged in February 1738.

 

In the fifth and final episode, the director looks into what happened later: what is the legacy of Oppenheimer’s life and career?

 

Previous accounts of Oppenheimer’s life and career are presented and discussed.

 

# 1. There was a novel written by the German author Lion Feuchtwanger (1884-1958). This novel was published in 1925.

 

# 2. There was a British historical drama based on Lion Feuchtwanger’s novel from 1925. This drama premiered in 1934.

 

# 3. There was a German historical drama created by the Nazis. This drama premiered in 1940, during World War Two. For the Nazis, the story of Oppenheimer was an occasion to produce a new round of anti-Jewish propaganda.

 

The portrait of Oppenheimer presented in the drama created by the Nazis is highly distorted. Some details in this drama are correct, but most of what is said and done here is pure fiction. The true story of Oppenheimer is turned upside down in order to fit the format of Nazi propaganda.

 

According to the Nazis, Oppenheimer was a criminal who deserved to be executed, because he had committed a series of serious crimes.

 

According to modern scholars, the charges against Oppenheimer were never proved. No evidence was presented to support the charges.

 

Oppenheimer was innocent. He did not get a fair trial. The verdict was given before the trial began.

 

He was a victim of antisemitism. What happened to him was a miscarriage of justice. The German word for a miscarriage of justice is Justizmord.

 

After the execution in 1738, the punishment of Oppenheimer continued. For his enemies, it was not enough to smear his reputation and kill him.

 

After the execution in 1738, his dead body was placed in a human-sized birdcage which was hanged from a high pillar outside Stuttgart.

 

His dead body was on public display for six years after his execution in 1738, until the inauguration of Karl Eugen, the next Duke of Württemberg.

 

In his first act as a ruler, he ordered that this corpse should be taken down and buried below the gallows.

 

The story of Joseph Süss Oppenheimer who was a victim of German antisemitism is important. It deserves to be told, and in this film, it is done very well.

 

I want to go all the way to the top with this product. I think it deserves a rating of five stars (100 percent).

 

REFERENCES

 

Jew Süss: Life, Legend, Fiction, Film

By Susan Tegel

(2011)

 

The Many Deaths of Jew Süss: The Notorious Trial and Execution of an Eighteenth-Century Court Jew

By Yair Mintzker

(2017 = hardcover)

(2019 = paperback)

 

*****

 

The German and Jewish businessman

Joseph Oppenheimer

(born ca. 1698)

(died 1738)

 

*****

 

This book by Yair Mintzker

about the trial of the German Jew 

Joseph Oppenheimer (1737-1738)

was published in 2017

 

*****